El cáncer, La Prohibida Curas-máquina de Rife, de revisión Científica

Maybe the worst case of medical suppression was the case of what I like to call broad specter resonance radiation technology (BSRR) first invented by Dr. Royal Raymond Rife. He did not name his invention this way. There was no name at the time except “The Rife machine.” I think that this name is an appropriate description of the technology.

La máquina de Rife era tan peligrosa para el establishment que llegaron a matar gente, quemar laboratorios y utilizar medios policiales, legales y monetarios, para sobornar, arrestar, intimidar, amenazar y todo lo que tuvieran a su disposición. Todo desde los más altos niveles del gobierno. Lo hicieron todo para suprimir la máquina de Rife. La supresión de esta tecnología es el peor caso de genocidio en la historia de la humanidad al nivel de los campos de concentración y no lo digo a la ligera (El cáncer, La Prohibida Curas-máquina de Rife, reseña Histórica).

To understand how the Rife machine works we have to go into physics and especially quantum mechanics. Most scientists to this day don’t understand the scientific background behind the Rife machine. They think that the Rife machine is some alternative quasi-scientific, unproven scam that is debunked easily. Because they do not understand the actual science behind it they label the Rife machine and even Rife himself as a quack that wanted to make a quick buck. All the usual slander that comes along in this kind of situation. In most cases even if they do understand the science behind the Rife machine it is so in the realm of scient fiction for most people that it is just rejected. In this article, I will review all of the science behind the Rife machine, and why the Rife machine was so dangerous that needed to disappear forever. Science itself is problematic to some because it goes against the perception of reality that some people might hold.

There is a big overlap in the meanings of “waves” and “radiation,” so this can also be a bit confusing. For a normal average individual to understand the technology, we will have to have a quick look into the basics of quantum mechanics and the nature of the universe or nature of the matter. Quantum mechanics is fundamental to explaining the functioning of systems at atomic length scales and smaller and is at the base of physics and defines the way that we comprehend the world scientifically.

Uno de los experimentos más importantes de la mecánica cuántica y de la ciencia que definió la forma en que percibimos el mundo es el experimento conocido como de la doble rendija. También es el experimento que no sólo definió nuestro mundo, sino que también creó el mayor problema de la ciencia hasta el momento que sigue "en el aire" y nadie, especialmente los científicos, no les gusta hablar de ello y evitar el tema.

If we have a barrier like a wall with two splits in it. Imagine throwing balls at the wall. Some will bounce off, but some will hit the slits. If there’s another wall behind the first, the balls that have gone through the slits will hit it.  If you identify all the points where a ball has hit the other wall, what do you expect to see? Two strips of marks are approximately identical in appearance to the slits. So any time when you throw something that was made of atoms through the slits you will get two strips of marks roughly the same shape as the slits. So far so good.

Pero, ¿y si dirigimos una luz (de un solo color, es decir, de una sola longitud de onda) hacia una pared con dos rendijas, o no sólo la luz, sino cualquier otra forma de onda hacia ella y no materia sólida como electrones o átomos? ¿Qué esperaríamos ver en la pared? Al pasar la onda por ambas rendijas.

It basically divides into two new waves, each expanding out from one of the slits. The waves will interfere with each other.  At some points, they will cancel each other out, and at others, where peak meets peak, they will reinforce each other and produce the strongest light. When the light goes through the slits you will see a stripe pattern on the second wall, many of the bright stripes are called an interference pattern. So when we shot solid matter, we get two stripes when we shot wave we get the interference pattern. So far so good.

¿Qué pasaría si en lugar de pelotas de tenis lanzáramos materia sólida del reino cuántico, como electrones?

Son materia como cualquier otra, así que deberíamos esperar sólo dos rendijas. En realidad, eso es lo que ocurrirá si sólo tenemos una rendija. Veremos que algunas de las partículas se moverán a través de la rendija abierta y golpearán la segunda pared. Ocurriría lo mismo que con las pelotas de tenis. Los puntos a los que llegan forman una franja aproximadamente de la misma forma que la rendija. Pero cuando abrimos la segunda rendija, ocurre algo antinatural. Supondríamos dos franjas rectangulares en la segunda pared, como con las pelotas de tenis, pero lo que se ve es muy diferente. Los puntos donde chocan los electrones se acumulan para reproducir el patrón de interferencia de una onda. Así que, de nuevo, cuando abrimos la segunda rendija tenemos un patrón de interferencia no natural de una onda. ¿Cómo es posible?

Como los científicos no podían explicarlo, teorizaron que, de algún modo, los electrones interfieren entre sí, de modo que no llegan a los mismos lugares a los que llegarían si estuvieran solos. Para contrarrestarlo hicieron el experimento disparando electrones individuales de uno en uno. Sin embargo, el patrón de interferencia continúa aún si se disparan los electrones de uno en uno.

Aquí hay algo que va muy mal.

Los electrones no presentan interferencias. Extrañamente, cada electrón individual contribuye con un punto a un patrón general que se parece al patrón de interferencia de una onda. ¿Cómo puede ser?

Percibimos el mundo de forma sólida. Pensamos que la materia existe y que el universo es sólido. Definimos nuestra realidad por la solidez de la materia. ¿Cómo podríamos vivir en una realidad que no es sólida, sino que sólo está hecha de ondas? No es posible.

Significaría que todo lo que percibimos es sólo una ilusión y que en realidad la materia es sólo una onda que percibimos como materia sólida. No es posible y necesitamos una explicación o redefinir la religión. ¿Podría ser que cada electrón de alguna manera se divide, pasa a través de ambas rendijas a la vez, interfiere consigo mismo y luego se recombina para encontrarse con la segunda pantalla como una sola partícula localizada?

Para averiguarlo, podemos instalar un detector junto a las rendijas, para detectar por qué rendija se mueve un electrón.

And that is when the seriousness comes in. Like it is already not enough that matter equally doesn’t exist and that everything is just the wave but wait there is more.

La pesadilla de la comunidad científica.

Si haces eso, coloca un detector junto a las rendijas, ¡entonces el patrón en la pantalla del detector se convierte en el patrón de partículas de dos tiras! El patrón de interferencia desaparece. De alguna manera, el acto de observar hace que los electrones viajen como pequeñas pelotas de tenis bien educadas. Sabían que estaban siendo observados y entonces forman el patrón de la materia sólida regular.

El acto de observar por parte de alguna forma de inteligencia fuerza a los electrones (o a cualquier otra forma de materia) a su forma sólida.

So all the matter is actually the wave and let’s say “download” itself into the matter when observed by inelegance. So any matter has duality in itself. The famous wave-particle duality of quantum mechanics defines our way of scientifically looking at the universe. However, scientists do not tell it all. They do not like this experiment too much because even today it is a big “mystery” of quantum mechanics. A scientist will say when asked that it is just a measurement problem of quantum mechanics. However, it is not. They are scared of it; they do not have an explanation that can go along with an acceptable way of looking at things, so they ignore the experiment.

For example, a scientist at Washington University found that quasi-measurements cause the Zeno effect possibly explaining why the particles do not form an interference pattern if one detects which slit they pass through, but somehow they seem to be leaving out the fact that the difference occurs only when being actively observed. Scientists may ignore the findings, but they still accept the results of what they call the dualistic nature of matter. What we accept as “particles,” such as electrons, somehow combine the characteristics of particles and the characteristics of waves.

Es la famosa dualidad onda-partícula de la mecánica cuántica.

Así que si la materia es sólo una onda, entonces tendría todas las características de la onda. La altura de una onda se denomina amplitud, la distancia entre un punto concreto de una onda y el mismo punto de la siguiente se denomina longitud de onda y, lo más importante, el número de ondas que pasan cada segundo se denomina frecuencia, f. La frecuencia se clasifica en unidades denominadas hercios (Hz). Cuanto más rápido viaja una onda, mayor es su frecuencia, pero menor es su longitud de onda. Cuando ondas de la misma frecuencia entran en contacto, se combinan en una onda de mayor amplitud o, si se prefiere, de mayor energía.

Se llama resonancia. Esto es importante para entender cómo funciona la "Máquina de Rife".

A well-known model is a playground swing, which works like a pendulum. Pushing a child in a swing in time with the natural interval of the swing (its resonant frequency) produces the swing going higher and higher (maximum amplitude). This is because the energy the swing absorbs is maximized when the pushes match the swing’s natural oscillations. So if the matter is just the wave then what defines different matter? Well as it turns out the lower the frequency the density of the matter is stronger. And every molecule has its own frequency in which it can resonate.

Los distintos átomos tienen frecuencias diferentes para toda la materia del universo.

Hay una buena cita de Nikola Tesla que dice:

“If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency, and vibration.”

If the frequency of one wave is extremely different than the frequency of another wave they will not just resonate, but they will not ever interact with each other at all. The two can occupy the same time and space. A good example is the waves that go into your cell phone. You can go inside the solid building but you will still have the signal on your phone, and the waves will go through the walls literally. However, if you have resonance, you can combine the energies to make some “destruction.”  Balanced twisting that was produced in the 1940 failure of “Galloping Gertie,” the original Tacoma Narrows Bridge, is characterized as an example of a resonance phenomenon. Armies have to break the step when crossing over the bridges. Alternatively, you can yell at the wine glass to shatter it. Voice can hit the resonance of glass at 550 Hz. It is in the human voice range. Such a strong, solid form like glass can shatter just from the sound.

 Todo tiene una frecuencia, incluso el propio planeta Tierra. Se conoce como resonancia Schumann. ¿Qué cree que ocurriría si alguien decidiera bombardear la Tierra con ondas a una frecuencia de resonancia Schumann? Habrá resonancia con la Tierra y, si se envía suficiente energía, esa energía no podrá disiparse de forma natural, sino que empezará a acumularse y, al final, se liberará en forma de terremoto creado artificialmente.

First, artificially created earthquake was created back in 1898 by Nicola Tesla. Besides all of the credited work and all of the work that other “great scientists” stole from him he was also credited to have worked on unknown energy sources, being contacted by UFOs, caused the Tunguska explosion by a death ray, and even worked on an earthquake-generator. Tesla said the oscillator was around 7 inches (18 cm) long and weighed one or two pounds; something “you could put in your overcoat pocket.” At one point while experimenting with the oscillator, he alleged it generated a resonance in several buildings causing complaints to the police. What happened was that he placed his tiny vibrator in his coat pocket and went out to seek a half-erected steel building. He found one in the Wall Street district. It was just steel and didn’t have a brick. He assembled the device to one of the beams. Tesla said that eventually the structure began to creak and weave and the steel workers came to the ground panic-stricken, believing that there had been an earthquake. Police and an ambulance were called. Ten minutes more and he would have laid the building to the street with something that you can put in your pocket. That is the power of resonance. However, his “telegeodynamics” system never managed to get beyond the prototype, but he also imagined using the oscillations generated by his device to prospect the underground. It is just this basic idea that modern seismologists use.

Hoy en día también utilizamos la resonancia en medicina. Por ejemplo, los átomos de hidrógeno del agua son sólo protones. Los protones tienen una frecuencia de resonancia con la que vibran (dentro del enorme campo magnético de una máquina de resonancia magnética). Y esa frecuencia de resonancia está en el rango de la radio. Así que cuando estás en la máquina de resonancia magnética, las ondas de radio están golpeando el agua de tu cuerpo, haciendo que los protones (átomos de hidrógeno) vibren (resuenen) en esa misma frecuencia. Los protones vibrantes emiten su propia señal de radio, y esa señal se utiliza para construir una imagen de tu pierna/cerebro/vientre acuoso. Es magnético. Es resonancia. Es imagen. RESONANCIA MAGNÉTICA.

Alternativamente, puede bombardear el agua con su propia frecuencia de molécula de agua en lugar de la frecuencia de los protones. Esto destruirá el enlace y forzará al hidrógeno y al oxígeno a separarse del H2O. Es la electrólisis sólo que cientos de veces más eficiente que la normal. Se supone que es tan eficiente que hay algunas patentes y afirma que usted puede hacer funcionar su coche en eso solo. ¿Has oído hablar alguna vez de un coche propulsado por agua? Probablemente no, pero su inventor, Stan Meyers, lo llamó Dune Buggy. Experimentó con la resonancia en su garaje y utilizó BSRR en lugar de la electrólisis normal para romper las moléculas de agua. El Pentágono mostró mucho interés en ese proyecto. Incluso enviaron a algunos de sus hombres a investigarlo.

He drove his Dune Buggy for a news report on an Ohio TV station and also calculated that from Los Angeles to New York it will use 22 gallons of water. Supposedly. There is no documented evidence that the system provides sufficient hydrogen to run an engine. Philip Ball, writing in the academic journal Nature, characterized Meyer’s claims as pseudoscience, noting that:

“It’s not easy to establish how Meyer’s car was meant to work, except that it involved a fuel cell that was able to split water using less energy than was released by recombination of the elements …”.

Probablemente no entendía la resonancia. El Pentágono sí.

Lo que no era la pseudociencia era el dinero. Le ofrecieron un soborno por una patente y para que se alejara de ricos inversores por valor de nada menos que 1.000 millones de dólares. Mil millones con B. Él se negó.

He wanted to put his invention into commercial use and was Christian and didn’t like “one world government” and wanted to give people self-sufficiency. Stanley Meyer departed suddenly on March 21, 1998, after eating at a restaurant. Conspiracy theorists insist that he was killed to suppress the technology and that the United States government were involved in his death. His brother claimed that during a meeting with two Belgian investors in a restaurant: “Stanley took a sip of cranberry juice. Then he grabbed his neck, bolted out the door, dropped to his knees and vomited violently. I ran outside and asked him, ‘What’s wrong?’ “. He said: “They poisoned me” and died.

Mayer’s water fuel cell was later examined by three expert witnesses in court who found there was nothing revolutionary about the cell at all and it was simply using conventional electrolysis, but it is possible that they did not understand the technology behind the double slit experiment. To date, no one reproduced his technology commercially, or at least that I know of.

There are just a couple more cases of individual inventors who made water cars with a similar approach like Herman P. Anderson who actually used a little bit different approach and deuterium (heavy water) was essential to his fuel cell. Herman was consulted with Nasa and the US Airforce on some of the country’s most important Top Secret Projects including the first US satellite in space, the SR-71 Blackbird, the Stealth Fighter/Bomber, and Star Wars. Herman worked closely with Nazi operation paperclip refugee Dr. Wernher von Braun testing hydrogen-powered rocket engines, and he also worked with engineers at the now famous Skunk Works, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, JPL, and Cal Tech. The government of the State of Tennessee allowed him to drive his water-powered car but had forbidden him to try to use his invention commercially. In any normal free country, he would be glorified as the man who freed the world from poverty. And yes most of our modern economy depends on energy consumption. With free energy, there would be no poverty and no environmental destruction, but there would also be an uncontrollable independent, self-sufficient population with no interest in war or obedience to corporate overloads and government. Imagine a world where energy is free and out of governmental control. There is one more individual case in Japan. They produced a water-powered car in 2008 that only runs on air and water. You can see it in the picture.

It is not a salt water battery electric car that is available commercially today, but again one more real water-powered car. Not surprisingly, there has been little to no coverage of this car in America or anywhere else. There was another good quote from Tesla’s life when he was confronted by J.P Morgan for his free wireless electric energy tower experiments. He said to him:

"Vale, ¿dónde voy a poner exactamente mi amperímetro? "

Sin embargo, ¿qué pasa con la medicina?

¿Tiene resonancia el cáncer?

Alternativamente, ¿qué tal el VIH?

¿Y qué hay de cualquier otra molécula de nuestro cuerpo?

In November 1931, Dr. Milbank Johnson called forty-four Los Angeles area doctors to his home in Pasadena, California to acknowledge Rife for the work he was performing. Dr. Royal Rife was acknowledged as the man who ended all diseases that ever existed. Well, at least the ones that are infectious and can be bombarded with resonance. The banquet was even called “The End of All Disease.”

Lo que ocurrió después, bueno, se tratará en el próximo artículo.

Referencias:

Pasajes seleccionados de un libro: Pokimica, Milos. Go Vegan? Examen de Ciencias de la Parte 2. Kindle ed., Amazon, 2018.

Posts Relacionados

• 
  La Medicina alopática-La Psicología del Miedo
• 
  La restricción de calorías, la Autofagia, la Longevidad, y la pérdida de masa Muscular
• 
  El cáncer, La Prohibida Curas - ESSIAC
• 
  Cáncer, las curas prohibidas: terapia inmunoaumentativa (IAT)
• 
  El Cáncer, La Prohibida Curas - Krebiozen
• 
  El cáncer, La Prohibida Curas-máquina de Rife, reseña Histórica
• 
  Proteína Completa: Señalización del IGF-1 en la Formación del Cáncer
• 
  Vitamina C Intravenosa en el Tratamiento del Cáncer: 40 Años de Pruebas
• 
  Medicamentos patentados, remedios a base de plantas y aprobación de la FDA
• 
  La Anatomía de Cáncer de riesgo para la Salud de las correlaciones
• 
  El Informe McGovern - Intereses especiales y supresión de la ciencia
• 
  La historia de Big Pharma - IG Farben
• 
  La historia de las grandes farmacéuticas: la familia Rockefeller
• 
  La cúrcuma como suplemento antioxidante: Optimización de la salud, longevidad e importancia clínica
• 
  La fluoración del agua - revisión Científica