Patented Medicine, Herbal Remedies, and FDA approval
War on plants had been waged by industry monopolists for more than 100 years now, and the final chapter is already written in the UN.
Milos Pokimica
Written By: Milos Pokimica
Medically Reviewed by: Dr. Xiùying Wáng, M.D.
Updated August 4, 2023The majority of people think that we live in an advanced democratic human rights-granted world of equal opportunities painted by the mainstream media governmental propaganda. Let me ask this. If they (people that own big pharma, banks, and other industries) actually researched and spend hundreds of millions of dollars to create medications that actually cured people, how would they continue to profit off our illnesses?
Or would they just treat symptoms and lie? And actually, so much more than just lying. They murder people, destroy people, and waged war against anything that threatens them. Anything that they cannot control is a threat. Both in the form of nature or in the form of technology that cannot be patented or technology that can be patented but is not very profitable because it cures disease instead of treating the symptoms. These people know exactly what the game is and what they are doing.
Anything that comes from nature cannot be patented. There are not interested in that. Everybody can grow a plant. That is a direct threat to industry interest. If there is a cure for some disease in the form of lifestyle changes, there are not interested in that. If there is some medicinal herb that works it must be destroyed. If it cannot be destroyed, then it has to be forbidden by law.
You translate that into the real world of FDA approval, and we get no interest in research into not patented medicine and no interest in research of conventional patented medicine that will really help people in the long run. And of course, the destruction of all things that exist already and has been proven to help. The way they do that is by the FDA.
People don’t realize that the FDA regulations it is illegal to use anything in existence unless it has been tested. You see the catch-22. Nothing from nature will ever be proven to be effective or safe because there is no one that is going to do the research that has the money to do the test. After all, there is no patent at the end of the test and no profit. They have control over you, and they do not like you. FDA does not do any testing of the drugs or supplements. It is relayed solely on submission from the drug companies when it makes its approval. In retrospect, it is designed to protect the industry, and it is a conflict of interest. It also has one more benefit for the industry. There is concern that the FDA has the power now to remove from the marketplace all of the new dietary ingredients that were introduced after October 1994. This includes a big chunk of supplements that are on the market.
People can go and buy potent herbal extras or other supplements and they can regulate their diet and lifestyle and get off the prescribed medicine, so the new law was passed in 1994. The FDA requires that manufacturers and distributors who wish to market dietary supplements that contain “new dietary ingredients” notify the FDA about these ingredients. Information requirement is to include information that is the basis on which the manufacturer or distributor has concluded that new dietary ingredients will reasonably be expected to be safe.
What the safe actually means? In the first decade of the new dietary ingredients guidelines, the FDA took a conservative view of what dietary ingredient was. They will say that if it was in the food supply and if you can show that it is in the food supply then they will allow you to sell it and not require you to make a scientific submission. In the ’90s FDA under pressure from the industry took a more restrictive approach by expanding the definition of a dietary ingredient and starting to keep more things out of the market and increasingly trying to regulate even the old supplements. The public reported purpose of the guidelines was to promote public safety for consumers. In reality, it had other intended purposes. Most of the supplement companies today were not present in 94. Of those that existed hardly any had records. What FDA is saying now is that your product is approved but only if you can scientifically prove it is safe because being on FDA published list before 94 is no proof anymore.
So you have to do the studies, and that seems fine if you are not familiar with the already mentioned catch-22. And of course, when the industry does their studies, they have billions to spend to alter the result in the desired way. We can only remember stories about Aspartame and MSG approval. This would be a topic for separate articles.
So today FDA basically requires a sort of preapproval from the companies and represents a sort of economic barrier for entry and results in the loss of small supplement manufacturers and the creation of a small number of big supplement companies that can be purchased by the big pharma and controlled.
It costs somewhere between $150,000 to about $1.3 million for one NDI (New Dietary Ingredient) submission. It is also made clear that approval of NDI is valid only for the company that submitted it and cannot be transferred to any other company, even if it is the same ingredient. They require every company that sells the same product to submit a new dietary ingredient submission. As a result, there are now even fewer supplements available, and they are even more expensive. The supplements that are pushed are the ones that are useless or dangerous but are in the industry’s interest to promote, like protein powders and bodybuilding chemicals. However, if you want to buy, for example, curcumin extract as support for cancer treatment, it will be more expensive than it should be. There were even attempts to force curcumin to be a prescribed pharmaceutical drug, but they failed.
However, the intention is there, and it goes in one direction. If there was any way to ban the turmeric plant and many other plants, they will gladly do it with no hesitation. Because there is not, or it is hard to do, because curcumin does not have any psychoactive properties and it is just a spice, there is nothing that the industry can do. However, then we have these forms of economic manipulation going on. Ingredients that we use to manage our health, from foods to concentrated nutrients sold as dietary supplements, are now being given requirements to prove safety before they can be used. Also, if hard to believe, but they want to ban medicinal foods too. The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act of 2007 (FSMA) gave the FDA unprecedented power over food. It gave the power to ban interstate commerce with any food in existence that has been studied for medicinal use. This act gives the FDA more power and more money to hire agents to run around the countryside of the USA to begin to arrest small organic gardeners and raw dairy farmers and intimidate even people who grow food for themselves in their own yards and gardens.
The idea that you take some plant that is grown for millennia and requires to enforce all kinds of double-blind placebo studies that underline regular drug testing is designed not to protect consumers but to remove the choice and to take responsibility for our own health from us and put it in the hand of industry and its enforcer the government.
And they did it already to the empirics and natural healers at the beginning of the 20th century but did not target individual people. Now they are going to target regular people as well. What are they going to do with this new authority is the same thing that they have done until now. Every product that comes on the market would be assumed to be an unsafe product, any natural herb should be assumed to be dangerous, any other medical treatment not approved by the FDA should be assumed to be dangerous, and every natural remedy, supplement, or anything else if not approved should be assumed to be dangerous and are going to be removed until people manufacturing that product prove that the product is safe. And if a product is already proven to be safe, the approval needs to be done again for every single company. The small farmer who wants to sell medicinal herbs is going to be treated like selling dangerous substances for example like selling poison or cannabis. It started to happen already today, but the intention is to be even more enforceable in the future.
By current law, what an agency can do to small farmers or small companies that did not approve its products is they can come and take everything the farmer or company owns of any value. They can do it without any advance notice, weapons drawn, barging into the business, seizing assets, freezing bank accounts, seizing all the products, and seizing all the material inside the offices, computers, papers, and files before trial or conviction. Charges can be both civil and criminal and can result in incarceration for a lifetime. Even if you don’t get indicted, what they do is ruin someone’s business completely. They did start to do this to some extent to local farmers, especially in regards to raw milk and herbal remedies, but there was some backlash, but that did not stop the intention.
What this is in reality all about is to start to push small businesses out. If you have a small family supplement company can you afford to spend up to 1 million for approval for every product? What would you do most likely is to send your kid to college so that he can get a job at a regular pharmacy and close. It is not logical to conclude that the government forces companies to test one ingredient that has been proven to be safe over and over again just for safety and what is completely out of the scope of logic is to force payment that goes up to more than a million dollars.
The real intention is to economic burden and then remove the small organic farmers and businesses, natural herbal doctors that are outside of the medical line, and all other “threats” with this well-calculated economic warfare.
And this is not just the US it has gone global.
War on plants had been waged by industry monopolists for more than 100 years now, and the final chapter is already written in the UN.
It is called Codex Alimentarius. That is a fancy Latin name for the world food code. The ambiguous title “Codex Alimentarius” is no accident. It was written by the same companies and even in some cases the same individuals, who wrote the Auschwitz concentration camp slogan “Arbeit mach frei” (“Work makes you free”). It was created in 1963s in the UN by the same oligarchy. It is a body that was established by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), and the World Health Organization (WHO). In fact, Codex is the next stage of intention for multi-national corporations razed above national sovereignty and enforced upon the world. The five segments of business that benefit from Codex are Big Bio-Tech, Big Chem, Big Medica, Big Pharma, and Big Agra biz.
References:
Passages selected from a book: Pokimica, Milos. Go Vegan? Review of Science Part 2. Kindle ed., Amazon, 2018.
Related Posts
Do you have any questions about nutrition and health?
I would love to hear from you and answer them in my next post. I appreciate your input and opinion and I look forward to hearing from you soon. I also invite you to follow us on Facebook, Instagram, and Pinterest for more diet, nutrition, and health content. You can leave a comment there and connect with other health enthusiasts, share your tips and experiences, and get support and encouragement from our team and community.
I hope that this post was informative and enjoyable for you and that you are prepared to apply the insights you learned. If you found this post helpful, please share it with your friends and family who might also benefit from it. You never know who might need some guidance and support on their health journey.
– You Might Also Like –

Learn About Nutrition
Milos Pokimica is a doctor of natural medicine, clinical nutritionist, medical health and nutrition writer, and nutritional science advisor. Author of the book series Go Vegan? Review of Science, he also operates the natural health website GoVeganWay.com
Medical Disclaimer
GoVeganWay.com brings you reviews of the latest nutrition and health-related research. The information provided represents the personal opinion of the author and is not intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. The information provided is for informational purposes only and is not intended to serve as a substitute for the consultation, diagnosis, and/or medical treatment of a qualified physician or healthcare provider.NEVER DISREGARD PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL ADVICE OR DELAY SEEKING MEDICAL TREATMENT BECAUSE OF SOMETHING YOU HAVE READ ON OR ACCESSED THROUGH GoVeganWay.com
NEVER APPLY ANY LIFESTYLE CHANGES OR ANY CHANGES AT ALL AS A CONSEQUENCE OF SOMETHING YOU HAVE READ IN GoVeganWay.com BEFORE CONSULTING LICENCED MEDICAL PRACTITIONER.
In the event of a medical emergency, call a doctor or 911 immediately. GoVeganWay.com does not recommend or endorse any specific groups, organizations, tests, physicians, products, procedures, opinions, or other information that may be mentioned inside.
Editor Picks –
Milos Pokimica is a doctor of natural medicine, clinical nutritionist, medical health and nutrition writer, and nutritional science advisor. Author of the book series Go Vegan? Review of Science, he also operates the natural health website GoVeganWay.com
Latest Articles –
Plant Based News
-
Some Dogs Can Sort Toys By Function, Says New Study On Canine ‘Label Extension’
on November 5, 2025
-
Courgette, Leek, White Bean And Kale Stew
on November 5, 2025
-
Precision Fermented Dairy Proteins Receive ‘No Questions’ Approval From FDA
on November 4, 2025
-
This One-Pan Ramen Is Ready In 30 Minutes
on November 4, 2025
-
How to Make Fresh Vanilla Hemp Milk at Home
on November 3, 2025
-
Animal Farming Is ‘World’s Biggest Cause Of Food Waste,’ Says Report
on November 3, 2025
-
Butter Bean And Sweet Papas Coconut Stew
on November 2, 2025
Top Health News — ScienceDaily
- Scientists uncover meditation’s hidden side effectson November 5, 2025
Meditation is widely praised for its mental health benefits, but new research shows that it can also produce unexpected side effects for some people—from anxiety and dissociation to functional impairment. Psychologist Nicholas Van Dam and his team found that nearly 60% of meditators experienced some kind of effect, and about a third found them distressing.
- Most Americans don’t know alcohol can cause canceron November 5, 2025
Most U.S. adults don’t realize alcohol raises cancer risk, and drinkers themselves are the least aware. Scientists say targeting these misbeliefs could significantly reduce alcohol-related cancer deaths.
- A breakthrough map reveals how the brain really workson November 5, 2025
Scientists have shown that brain connectivity patterns can predict mental functions across the entire brain. Each region has a unique “connectivity fingerprint” tied to its role in cognition, from language to memory. The strongest links were found in higher-level thinking skills that take years to develop. This work lays the groundwork for comparing healthy and disordered brains.
- A shapeshifting protein explains rabies’ deadly poweron November 5, 2025
Researchers discovered how rabies virus exerts massive control over host cells with very few genes. A key viral protein changes shape and binds RNA, allowing it to infiltrate different cellular systems. This adaptability could explain the power of other deadly viruses, including Nipah and Ebola. The breakthrough may lead to next-generation antivirals or vaccines.
- Cockroaches are secretly poisoning indoor airon November 5, 2025
Cockroach infestations don’t just bring creepy crawlers, they fill homes with allergens and bacterial toxins that can trigger asthma and allergies. NC State researchers found that larger infestations meant higher toxin levels, especially from female roaches. When extermination eliminated the pests, both allergens and endotoxins plummeted. The findings highlight how pest control is vital for cleaner, healthier air indoors.
- Scientists shocked to find E. coli spreads as fast as the swine fluon November 5, 2025
Researchers have, for the first time, estimated how quickly E. coli bacteria can spread between people — and one strain moves as fast as swine flu. Using genomic data from the UK and Norway, scientists modeled bacterial transmission rates and discovered key differences between strains. Their work offers a new way to monitor and control antibiotic-resistant bacteria in both communities and hospitals.
- Tiny molecules could stop glaucoma before it blindson November 5, 2025
Scientists at Mizzou have identified two small molecules, agmatine and thiamine, that could both reveal and fight glaucoma. Their research shows these compounds are lower in glaucoma patients, suggesting they may serve as early warning markers. Even better, they might help protect retinal cells from damage, potentially slowing or stopping vision loss. The discovery could revolutionize how the disease is detected and treated.
PubMed, #vegan-diet –
- Impact of in vitro digestion on the cytotoxicity and microbial viability of cholinesterase-inhibitor-rich vegan soups in human intestinal cell modelson November 1, 2025
Vegan lunch soups formulated with mushroom, asparagus, leek, and sea buckthorn were previously developed by our team to provide a consistent daily intake of dietary cholinesterase inhibitors. Considering the proposed continuous consumption of these functional soups, it is essential to examine any cytotoxic responses that may occur in the gastro-intestinal tract. This work starts this topic by investigating the effect of in vitro digested soups towards selected human intestinal cells and…
- A 6-Month, Prospective, Multi-arm Study for the Efficacy of Standardized Nutraceuticals to Improve Hair Fiber Thickness and Strengthon October 31, 2025
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that ingestion of these bio-specific HGNs are associated with significantly enhanced hair shaft diameter and decreased breakage, resulting in longer, stronger hair across their intended populations. These findings support the use of these HGNs for hair thinning, offering alternative options for various populations for improving hair growth and thickness.
- Consumer Acceptance of Sustainable Cat Diets: A Survey of 1380 Cat Guardianson October 29, 2025
There is increasing awareness about the adverse environmental and ‘food’ animal welfare impacts associated with the production of meat-based pet food. However, little is known about cat guardians’ acceptance of more sustainable food choices for the global population of approximately 476 million pet cats. By surveying 1380 cat guardians, this study explored feeding patterns used by guardians, determinants of their cat food choices, and their acceptance levels of more sustainable cat food…
- Consumer Acceptance of Sustainable Dog Diets: A Survey of 2639 Dog Guardianson October 29, 2025
Interest in more sustainable diets for the global population of 528 million companion dogs is steadily increasing, encompassing nutritionally sound cultivated meat, vegan, and microbial protein-based dog foods. Factors driving these alternative dog foods include lower impacts on the environment, fewer welfare problems related to intensively farmed animals and wild-caught fish, and potentially superior canine health outcomes, relative to conventional meat-based dog food. Through a […]
- Beliefs and behaviours associated with vegetarian, vegan, and gluten-free diets among Canadians capable of bearing childrenon October 29, 2025
There is increased interest in self-selected exclusionary diet patterns, specifically vegetarian, vegan, and gluten-free (GF) diets, but there is a lack of research exploring the beliefs and behaviours surrounding these diets in Canadians capable of bearing children (CCBC). The goal of this study was to explore the beliefs and behaviours of CCBC who follow vegetarian, vegan, and/or GF diets using mixed methods. A self-administered online Qualtrics™ survey containing 102 questions was […]
Random Posts –
Featured Posts –

Latest from PubMed, #plant-based diet –
- Diet quality scores and incidence of cardiovascular events: A 4-year prospective study of patients in cardiology secondary care (BALANCE Program Trial)by Aline Rosignoli da Conceição on November 5, 2025
As a modifiable determinant, dietary patterns are a crucial factor in the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD), as they account for more than half of all CVD-related deaths and disabilities. Thus, we aimed to assess whether changes in diet quality along with six a priori-defined diet scores were associated with the incidence of cardiovascular (CV) events during four years of follow-up of secondary care cardiology patients. We conducted a secondary prospective analysis of 1,704, 1,629 […]
- Dietary animal fat disrupts gut microbiota and aggravates Scl-cGVHD after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transferby Danielle D Millick on November 5, 2025
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (allo-HCT) is an effective treatment for high-risk or relapsed acute leukemia. However, the frequent occurrence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) poses significant complications. Modifiable factors such as the gut microbiome and dietary regimen have the potential to influence the frequency and severity of GVHD. Previous studies in mouse models have shown a direct link between obesity and increased severity of GVHD. Analysis of human data has not…
- Dose-response effects of a mixed condensed and hydrolyzable tannin extract on methane production and diet digestibility using the in vitro gas production techniqueby Jordan M Adams on November 5, 2025
Several studies have evaluated the impact of isolated condensed or hydrolyzable tannin extract (TE) supplementation for beef cattle on methane (CH4) mitigation and metabolic functions, but fewer have evaluated their combination. Our objective was to investigate changes in in vitro fermentation dynamics, CH4 production, neutral detergent fiber digestibility (ivNDFD), and ruminal volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations in response to the inclusion rate of a TE blend (Silvafeed ByPro; […]
- Discovery of urinary biomarkers of kiwifruit intake in a randomized intervention studyby Zilin Xiao on November 4, 2025
CONCLUSIONS: This study identified potential biomarkers of kiwifruit and developed a prediction model that may differentiate consumers. Further validation is necessary to confirm the reliability and generalizability of our findings.
- Nourishing the Skin: A Review of Diet’s Role in Hidradenitis Suppurativaby Jordan Beam on November 4, 2025
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a complex skin condition influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. Increasing evidence points to diet as a key contributor to disease severity through systemic inflammatory pathways. A review of recent literature was conducted to evaluate the relationship between dietary patterns and advancement of HS. Pro-inflammatory diets such as the Western diet, leucine-rich diets, and brewer’s yeast were associated with HS exacerbation through mTOR activation…
- Energy balance in cyclists on plant-based diets during a 30-day, 4300-km ride across Canada: Two case studiesby Sarah A Purcell on November 3, 2025
The popularity of ultra-endurance events and plant-based diets highlights the importance of understanding the energetics of athletes with diverse dietary preferences. This study examined energy balance in two recreational cyclists on plant-based diets (male, 41 years; female, 38 years) during a 30-day cross-Canada ride. Resting energy expenditure was measured via whole-room indirect calorimetry before and after the ride. Total energy expenditure (TEE) was assessed using doubly labeled water…
























