Vitamin D deficiency- The optimization strategies
Written By: Milos Pokimica
Medically Reviewed by: Dr. Xiùying Wáng, M.D.
Updated June 9, 2023Vitamin D is an essential vitamin with many different functions. It is a prohormone, steroid with a hormone-like activity that regulates about 3% of the human genome (Carlberg, 2019). More than 2,000 genes overall. It is essential for different life functions, for instance, one of them is calcium development. Besides calcium metabolism, immune system regulation will be one of vitamin D’s most essential functions. Science so far doesn’t have research for every gene that vitamin D can activate but it is important to understand that without vitamin D level optimization even if we don’t have blatant vitamin D deficiency, we will suffer from a wide range of health issues even if we don’t have a directly visible bone disease. Vitamin D deficiency is a worst-case scenario.
Also, we need to understand that optimizing vitamin D levels is important for the long-term prevention of osteoporosis. Osteoporosis starts long before and lasts for a long time until the visible effects can be diagnosed. Having high bone density in younger years and preventing vitamin D deficiency throughout our entire life will have an impact on bone density in old age. Visible symptoms of vitamin D deficiency rickets that include bone deformities and bone pain, slow growth, fractures, and seizures are already the last stages of chronic deficiency disease. It cannot be cured with vitamin D supplementation and with additional calcium because the damage is already done. Prevention is the only way. The way osteoporosis can be treated is with additional medications that will promote calcium metabolism in the bones. Problem is that taking medication for osteoporosis has other side effects. Some medication like Reclast (zoledronic acid) is even taken intravenously every two years to help prevent it. Vitamin D is a vitamin and that means it is essential for life there is no way that we can avoid that simple fact even if we disregard the effects it has on bone disease. Not optimizing our vitamin D levels is the same as having any other nutrient deficiency of any other essential nutrient with one difference and that is that it takes a little longer time for its effects to be visible but at the same time once when we lose our bone density it is hard to bring it back.
There is one other difference between vitamin D and every other essential nutrient. That difference is that we create our own vitamin D if we have sun exposure so we do not need to ingest it in the food. There is some vitamin D in the foods that we eat and some food products are fortified with it but the level of fortification is not at the optimal level and vitamin D deficiency is rampant in most of the population. In the US around 40% of the population is in the severe vitamin D deficiency category and more than 85% are in the insufficient level category (Carlberg, 2019). Most likely if you do not have a severe deficiency you will still lack an adequate and optimal level of vitamin D for normal body functioning. What causes vitamin D deficiency is a modern way of life, it is a form of maladaptation to our current environment.
So the question arises, how much do we need for optimal health optimization?
In the medical field usual scientific practice is to recommend nutrition intake at the levels that are needed to prevent the disease. It is not an accepted scientific method to recommend the levels that are the most optimal and that we are adapted to in our evolution. It is only the levels that scientists believe are necessary to prevent a pure form of vitamin D deficiency.
Up until recently, the official RDA for vitamin D was considered to be 200 international units a day and that was an average intake for most people. And before that, there was an accepted belief that 100 IU of vitamin D3 is enough to prevent flagrant signs and symptoms of rickets. Because the number of 100 units was enough to prevent bone disease scientists with no real experimentation recommended 200 units just to be safe. They believed that that was more than adequate to satisfy the body’s vitamin D requirement. Then there was a line of experiments when the Institute of Medicine decided to make a recommendation on specific blood levels of vitamin D that should prevent rickets. They calculated that to get to this level most people would require about 600 IUs a day.
Today the RDA is 600 IU a day and that is an official recommendation. With this new RDA, around 40% of Americans still have vitamin D deficiency. The problem is that even these 600 IU’s are far less than what would be the most optimal level in an evolutionary sense. The level that will promote the most health and longevity effects. One way the medicine can determent the most optimal level is by testing for the hormone in the blood called PTH. Our bodies secrete PTH in situations when the body detects that we don’t have adequate levels of active vitamin D3 for bone metabolism in an effort to raise its levels. When levels in the bloodstream go below 20 nanograms/ml our body will start to produce PTH to protect our bones from softening. And this is just bones.
Vitamin D affects our entire genome and most of the organs and their functioning from the brain to muscle tissue. Measuring just its effects on calcium metabolism is still not the optimal strategy.
“Body requires 5- to 10-fold higher intakes than is currently recommended by health agencies. There is now overwhelming and compelling scientific and epidemiologic data suggesting that the human body requires a blood level of 25(OH)D above 30 ng/mL for maximum health. To increase the blood level to the minimum 30 ng/mL requires the ingestion of at least 1000 IU of vitamin D per day for adults.”
(Holick, 2010)
It is also important for immune system function and prevention of autoimmune diseases from allergies to asthma to multiple sclerosis, prevention of cancers of a different type, periodontal disease prevention, depression, obesity, diabetes type 2, and overall mortality. (Glade, 2013)
“Adequate vitamin D status seems to be protective against musculoskeletal disorders (muscle weakness, falls, fractures), infectious diseases, autoimmune diseases, cardiovascular disease, type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, several types of cancer, neurocognitive dysfunction and mental illness, and other diseases, as well as infertility and adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes. Vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency is associated with all-cause mortality.”
(Pludowski et al., 2013)
At one point in the 20th century, even wire cages were affixed to tenement buildings so that people can put babies in there so that babies could benefit from the sun.
Beyond rickets prevention, if we manage to prevent all of the diseases that are caused by vitamin D deficiency, it is still important vitamin for all-cause mortality, meaning it will promote longevity even if we don’t have any disease risk. We will live longer if we have normal and optimized levels. But what exactly are the optimal levels? One way is to measure the level of vitamin D and compare it to different rates of diseases but that does not directly mean that is the optimal level because it is just observation. Vitamin D deficiency might not be the cause. What is needed is clinical trials where you give people D supplements to prove that vitamin D is effective.
In the last 50 years, there are hundreds of clinical trials involving more than 100,000 people so we have the knowledge now. Vitamin D does help in disease prevention, it does promote longevity and it is cheap. The effects are also potent for example 13% in terms of reduction of total mortality (Chowdhury, 2014). The level of reduction that everyday exercise will cause is 11% so the effects are even more pronounced than everyday exercise. Also, the effect is cumulative. And also this is on top of all the benefits we will have on chronic diseases that can deteriorate the quality of life and are not life-threatening like allergies for example. Keep in mind that taking supplemental vitamin D is no excuse to eat one more donut. Healthy eating will have a cumulative effect on vitamin D optimization. In most studies, the levels of vitamin D are also not completely optimized so the reduction in mortality can be higher if we take an adequate level of supplementation. Also, the positive effects are only correlated with supplementation with active D3 type. It is the type derived from plants and animals and not vitamin D2, the type derived from mushrooms.
So how much? The answer is it depends. Two different individuals can get the same dose but will have different levels in the bloodstream. Then it depends on sun exposure, it depends on dietary intake. The optimal level of supplementation can be only measured with a blood test in individual cases. When scientists give recommendations they will be based on relative numbers for the percentage of the population. For example, they will say take “this” amount of it and 3 out of 5 people will have more “that” that level in the bloodstream. It is not the rule but more in line with recommendations. You will have to do a blood test if you want to know the exact level in your blood.
The problem with vitamins is that you can take too much. In the case of vitamin D and its benefits is not as dangerous vitamin as vitamin A for example. If you overdose on vitamin A you can have serious problems. For example, supplemental vitamin E promotes cancer while dietary vitamin E prevents cancer even at the optimal level. We have to analyze the optimal level and then we have to find the optimal supplementation strategy that will in our individual case put us to that optimal level.
With vitamin D it was believed to be a U shape curve. Most of the benefits in the studies will get at around 70 to 80 nmol/L (Bischoff-Ferrari, 2008). This is the optimal level in the blood. For cancer prevention, the level can be as high as 90-120 nmol/l. More than that will have no additional health benefits. Also, very high levels are correlated with a slight increase in mortality. The risk and increase are not substantial but the apparent sweet spot is around 75 or 80 nanomoles per liter [nmol/L] and more than that you will just be wasting money.
Because vitamin D is a hormone not a vitamin per se there was a debate in the scientific community about its toxic level. The good news is that in order to go to the toxic level we will have to do a serious supplemental overdosing in levels of more than 10,000 IU a day for an extended period. In real-life conditions, although it is still a U-shaped curve it is practically an L curve (Garland et al., 2014).
We can get to an optimal dose without the risk of overdosing and that is good news. We don’t have to do testing and worry about overdose as long as we don’t go above the levels of 10,000 IU a day for an extended period of time. Testing is not recommended and it is not necessary, it is expensive and not accurate. If you do testing there will be a variation in results from 2 to 5 times in different laboratories. You can get a result of 30 ng/ml or 120 ng/ml. In all practical sense, testing is useless. So how much should we take?
An intake of no less than 1000 IU of vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) per day for all adults may bring at least 50% of the population up to 75 nmol/l (30ng/ml). This means 5 out of 10 people will be at an optimal level depending on their skin color, level of sun exposure, and dietary intake and this is for a population in the US. Because essentially there is no risk of excessive intake of vitamin D the supplementation for 100 percent of the population for everyone to be in the optimal range including individuals with zero sun exposure and zero dietary intake, the dose will be 2200IU. For most of the population anywhere in the world to have a value of 80nmol/L or higher may require a daily oral intake of 2200IU.
Because the government doesn’t want people to overdose themselves even if there is no real risk the tolerable upper intake level is currently set at 2000IU/day.
Actual toxicity is not seen below serum values of 250nmol/L, a value that would be produced only at continuing oral intakes in excess of 10,000IU/day.
The margin of toxicity is extensive. So how much should you take? Because it is one of the cheapest supplements the answer is at least 2200IU a day and more if you are obese and more the older you are. If you are 70 years old you will need 3,500IU to reach the same level.
There might be some risks of toxicity if you overdose that science has not determent yet especially in you have some sort of condition. It also has the potential to lower vitamin A levels. That is the reason you don’t want to overdose. There is no need for it. But again overdosing on vitamin D is very hard to do. For example, in a situation where we are exposed to the sun, our body is able to create thousands of units of it in minutes and is able to store it as well. We cannot naturally overdose ourselves with sun exposure. It will just be stored for later use. That means our body will be able to mobilize its own reserves if our daily intake falters temporarily. It is an oil-soluble vitamin and that is the reason obese people need more, in some cases two times more of it to reach the same blood levels. It is a reason for wide confusion and public recommendations that can range from 600IU to 10,000IU.
References:
- Carlberg C. (2019). Nutrigenomics of Vitamin D. Nutrients, 11(3), 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11030676
- Parva, N. R., Tadepalli, S., Singh, P., Qian, A., Joshi, R., Kandala, H., Nookala, V. K., & Cheriyath, P. (2018). Prevalence of Vitamin D Deficiency and Associated Risk Factors in the US Population (2011-2012). Cureus, 10(6), e2741. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2741
- Holick M. F. (2010). Vitamin D: extraskeletal health. Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America, 39(2), . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2010.02.016
- Glade M. J. (2013). Vitamin D: health panacea or false prophet?. Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.), 29(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2012.05.010
- Pludowski, P., Holick, M. F., Pilz, S., Wagner, C. L., Hollis, B. W., Grant, W. B., Shoenfeld, Y., Lerchbaum, E., Llewellyn, D. J., Kienreich, K., & Soni, M. (2013). Vitamin D effects on musculoskeletal health, immunity, autoimmunity, cardiovascular disease, cancer, fertility, pregnancy, dementia and mortality-a review of recent evidence. Autoimmunity reviews, 12(10), 976–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2013.02.004
- Chowdhury, R. (2014). Vitamin D and risk of cause specific death: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort and randomised intervention studies. Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews – NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK200718/
- Bischoff-Ferrari H. A. (2008). Optimal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels for multiple health outcomes. Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 624, 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77574-6_5
- Garland, C. F., Kim, J. J., Mohr, S. B., Gorham, E. D., Grant, W. B., Giovannucci, E. L., Baggerly, L., Hofflich, H., Ramsdell, J. W., Zeng, K., & Heaney, R. P. (2014). Meta-analysis of all-cause mortality according to serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D. American journal of public health, 104(8), e43–e50. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302034
Related Posts
Do you have any questions about nutrition and health?
I would love to hear from you and answer them in my next post. I appreciate your input and opinion and I look forward to hearing from you soon. I also invite you to follow us on Facebook, Instagram, and Pinterest for more diet, nutrition, and health content. You can leave a comment there and connect with other health enthusiasts, share your tips and experiences, and get support and encouragement from our team and community.
I hope that this post was informative and enjoyable for you and that you are prepared to apply the insights you learned. If you found this post helpful, please share it with your friends and family who might also benefit from it. You never know who might need some guidance and support on their health journey.
– You Might Also Like –
Learn About Nutrition
Milos Pokimica is a doctor of natural medicine, clinical nutritionist, medical health and nutrition writer, and nutritional science advisor. Author of the book series Go Vegan? Review of Science, he also operates the natural health website GoVeganWay.com
Medical Disclaimer
GoVeganWay.com brings you reviews of the latest nutrition and health-related research. The information provided represents the personal opinion of the author and is not intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. The information provided is for informational purposes only and is not intended to serve as a substitute for the consultation, diagnosis, and/or medical treatment of a qualified physician or healthcare provider.NEVER DISREGARD PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL ADVICE OR DELAY SEEKING MEDICAL TREATMENT BECAUSE OF SOMETHING YOU HAVE READ ON OR ACCESSED THROUGH GoVeganWay.com
NEVER APPLY ANY LIFESTYLE CHANGES OR ANY CHANGES AT ALL AS A CONSEQUENCE OF SOMETHING YOU HAVE READ IN GoVeganWay.com BEFORE CONSULTING LICENCED MEDICAL PRACTITIONER.
In the event of a medical emergency, call a doctor or 911 immediately. GoVeganWay.com does not recommend or endorse any specific groups, organizations, tests, physicians, products, procedures, opinions, or other information that may be mentioned inside.
Editor Picks –
Milos Pokimica is a doctor of natural medicine, clinical nutritionist, medical health and nutrition writer, and nutritional science advisor. Author of the book series Go Vegan? Review of Science, he also operates the natural health website GoVeganWay.com
Latest Articles –
Plant Based News
-
This Sweet Potato Grilled Cheese Is A Game Changer – And It’s Vegan
on April 25, 2024
-
This Lentil Stroganoff Is Packed With Plant Protein
on April 24, 2024
-
Is Decaf Coffee Really Unsafe? What You Need To Know
on April 23, 2024
-
How To Make This Gut-Friendly Miso Mushroom Risotto
on April 23, 2024
-
Brazil Is Expanding Its Beef Exports – What Does This Mean For The Amazon?
on April 23, 2024
-
Dairy And Oat Blended Milk Sparks Backlash
on April 23, 2024
-
Try This Spinach Arugula Salad With Candied Pecans And Apples
on April 22, 2024
Top Health News — ScienceDaily
- Early trauma cuts life short for squirrels, and climate change could make matters worseon April 25, 2024
Life can be tough for young red squirrels living in the Canada’s Yukon territory, where frigid winters, food scarcity and predators threaten their long-term survival. Scientists want to know what factors might protect young squirrels, especially as their environment becomes more impacted by climate change.
- Food in sight? The liver is ready!on April 25, 2024
What happens in the body when we are hungry and see and smell food? A team of researchers has now been able to show in mice that adaptations in the liver mitochondria take place after only a few minutes. Stimulated by the activation of a group of nerve cells in the brain, the mitochondria of the liver cells change and prepare the liver for the adaptation of the sugar metabolism. The findings could open up new avenues for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
- Advanced cell atlas opens new doors in biomedical researchon April 25, 2024
Researchers have developed a web-based platform that offers an unprecedented view of the human body at the cellular level. The aim is to create an invaluable resource for researchers worldwide to increase knowledge about human health and disease.
- National trial safely scaled back prescribing of a powerful antipsychotic for the elderlyon April 25, 2024
Warning letters can safely cut prescribing of a powerful but risky antipsychotic, according to a new study. Researchers used Medicare data to study the effects of the letters on hundreds of thousands of older adults with dementia. They found a significant and lasting reduction in prescribing but no signs of adverse effects on patient health.
- Solving the riddle of the sphingolipids in coronary artery diseaseon April 24, 2024
Investigators have uncovered a way to unleash in blood vessels the protective effects of a type of fat-related molecule known as a sphingolipid, suggesting a promising new strategy for the treatment of coronary artery disease.
- Use of acid reflux drugs linked to higher risk of migraineon April 24, 2024
People who take acid-reducing drugs may have a higher risk of migraine and other severe headache than people who do not take these medications, according to a new study. The acid-reducing drugs include proton pump inhibitors such as omeprazole and esomeprazole, histamine H2-receptor antagonists, or H2 blockers, such as cimetidine and famotidine, and antacid supplements.
- A closed-loop drug-delivery system could improve chemotherapyon April 24, 2024
To improve chemotherapy dosing, engineers designed CLAUDIA, a way to continuously measure how much drug is in a patient’s system during hours-long infusion.
PubMed, #vegan-diet –
- Psychological differences and similarities between vegans, prospective vegans, and vegetarians. Motivation, knowledge, vegan literacy – and cheeseon April 25, 2024
INTRODUCTION: Although vegan and vegetarian diets and lifestyles differ significantly from each other, among other things, notably in their respective consequences regarding animal welfare and their ecological impact, vegans and vegetarians are often grouped together and usually compared to omnivores in psychological research. Considering that vegans and vegetarians often share similar motives for their lifestyle choices, namely animal and environmental issues, the question arises why similar…
- Vegan grade medium component screening and concentration optimization for the fermentation of the probiotic strain Lactobacillus paracasei IMC 502 using Design of Experimentson April 24, 2024
Lactobacillus paracasei IMC502® is a commercially successful probiotic strain, however, there are no reports that investigate growth medium composition in relation to improved biomass production for this strain. The major outcome of the present study is the design and optimization of a growth medium based on vegan components to be used in the cultivation of Lactobacillus paracasei IMC502®, by using Design of Experiments (DoE). Besides comparing different carbon sources, the use of […]
- What’s cooking? The normalization of meat in YouTube recipe videos consumed by South Asian British Muslimson April 23, 2024
Muslim consumers in the UK eat more meat than the national average. Individuals from ethnic minority backgrounds, particularly South Asian communities, experience poorer health outcomes, including diabetes and cardiovascular disease, associated with meat consumption. According to a YouGov survey, British Pakistani and Bangladeshi consumers use television cookery programs and social media (particularly YouTube) as their main digital sources of dietary information. Against this background, this…
- Nutrition: Micronutrientson April 22, 2024
Micronutrients are nutrients the body needs in small quantities, such as vitamins and minerals. Micronutrient deficiencies can occur when an individual is restricting calorie intake for weight loss or management, not consuming an adequate amount of food to meet energy requirements due to poor appetite or illness, eliminating one or more food groups from the diet on a regular basis, or consuming a diet low in micronutrient-rich foods despite adequate or excessive energy intake. Patient groups […]
- From Tofu to T-Bones: How Vegan and Ketogenic Diets Shape Our Immune Defenseson April 22, 2024
Link et al. conducted a controlled study comparing the impacts of ketogenic and vegan diets on energy intake and immune function in humans. Deep -omics analyses revealed distinct effects of each diet on the immune system, including changes in cell populations and blood transcriptomes indicative of diet-induced shifts between adaptive and innate immunity. The study highlights the potentially significant, rapid impact of diet on immune function and health.
Random Posts –
Featured Posts –
Latest from PubMed, #plant-based diet –
- MicroRNAs from edible plants reach the human gastrointestinal tract and may act as potential regulators of gene expressionby Ester Díez-Sainz on April 25, 2024
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small single-stranded non-coding RNA molecules that regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. A cross-kingdom regulatory function has been unveiled for plant miRNAs (xenomiRs), which could shape inter-species interactions of plants with other organisms (bacteria and humans) and thus, be key functional molecules of plant-based food in mammals. However, discrepancies regarding the stability and bioavailability of dietary plant miRNAs on the host cast in…
- Mapping the evidence of novel plant-based foods: a systematic review of nutritional, health, and environmental impacts in high-income countriesby Sarah Nájera Espinosa on April 24, 2024
CONCLUSION: If carefully selected, certain NPBFs have the potential to be healthier and nutrient-rich alternatives to ABFs and typically have smaller environmental footprints. More disaggregated categorization of various types of NPBFs would be a helpful step in guiding consumers and key stakeholders to make informed decisions. To enable informed policymaking on the inclusion of NPBFs in dietary transitions as part of a wider net-zero and health strategy, future priorities should include…
- Vegan grade medium component screening and concentration optimization for the fermentation of the probiotic strain Lactobacillus paracasei IMC 502® using Design of Experimentsby Darshankumar Parecha on April 24, 2024
Lactobacillus paracasei IMC502® is a commercially successful probiotic strain, however, there are no reports that investigate growth medium composition in relation to improved biomass production for this strain. The major outcome of the present study is the design and optimization of a growth medium based on vegan components to be used in the cultivation of Lactobacillus paracasei IMC502®, by using Design of Experiments (DoE). Besides comparing different carbon sources, the use of […]
- Metaproteomics and DNA metabarcoding as tools to assess dietary intake in humansby Brianna L Petrone on April 22, 2024
Objective biomarkers of food intake are a sought-after goal in nutrition research. Most biomarker development to date has focused on metabolites detected in blood, urine, skin or hair, but detection of consumed foods in stool has also been shown to be possible via DNA sequencing. An additional food macromolecule in stool that harbors sequence information is protein. However, the use of protein as an intake biomarker has only been explored to a very limited extent. Here, we evaluate and […]
- Mitigating digestive disorders: Action mechanisms of Mediterranean herbal active compoundsby Abdalsalam Kmail on April 22, 2024
This study explores the effects of the Mediterranean diet, herbal remedies, and their phytochemicals on various gastrointestinal conditions and reviews the global use of medicinal plants for common digestive problems. The review highlights key plants and their mechanisms of action and summarizes the latest findings on how plant-based products influence the digestive system and how they work. We searched various sources of literature and databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Science…
- Lifestyle Interventions in a Patient Identified as Super-Super Obese With a Body Mass Index of 90.5by Ghadeer Al Ghareeb on April 22, 2024
Obesity is a growing global health concern. Saudi Arabia is experiencing a higher prevalence of obesity compared to the globe. This case report focuses on a 38-year-old female with a body mass index (BMI) of 90.5 kg/m², prediabetes, and obstructive sleep apnea who successfully underwent a lifestyle modification process resulting in remarkable weight loss. The patient’s past unsuccessful attempts at weight loss had left her with a reluctance to try again initially. A multidisciplinary team…