Allopathic Medicine-The Psychology of Fear
Written By: Milos Pokimica
Medically Reviewed by: Dr. Xiùying Wáng, M.D.
Updated June 9, 2023People are born with only two instinctive fears. One is the fear of falling, and the other is the fear of intense noises. Everything else we fear has been obtained during our lifetime and is usually generated by some circumstances and situations that have registered in our minds and emotions in a way that makes us feel scared. That is when our body responds with the fight or flight response.
Fear is the strongest emotion of all, and it eventually conditions our behavior. Fear is stronger than rational thinking because it is a conditioned evolutionary response for keeping us alive. For all animals and for our hominin ancestors some real fears were fear of becoming a meal and fear of starvation.
The humans might add the third one, and that is fear of the disease.
Today we do not have to fear predation anymore and for most of the developed world fear of hunger does not exist. However, there is still fear of the disease. And where is fear there is manipulation.
Some people are very good at utilizing the emotions of others for their own benefit. They like to call that marketing or propaganda. It is just emotional manipulation. In some cases, withholding the facts can have the same desired effect.
Don’t get me wrong having a profit in medicine is nothing bad. The problem arose when medicine became part of a larger hierarchical structure system that is designed for widespread control and usage of people as a resource.
In modern medicine, profit is mostly made on sick people. Healthy individuals are not very lucrative. You can sell them supplements, but that market is not where the real money lies. Nobody around you will have any interest to tell you the whole truth and keep you healthy except you. It is only your job and nobody else’s. It is not the job of your doctor. He does not care about your health. He is going to stop listening to you seconds after you started speaking. What he is going to do is to write the prescription, and if anything goes wrong, he is also considering how to protect himself from liability. That is his real job. Even if he wanted to spend time on you, he would have a hard time because the doctors themselves do not know what the truth is outside of what they learn in college and actually have a life expectancy that is much shorter than average. Furthermore, even if there is some real miracle cure the interest will be to silence it. Just cancer treatment drugs made the industry $117 billion worldwide in 2018 and are projected to exceed $150 billion by 2021. And that is without an endless chain of medical tests, operations, and support therapies. That is a reality.
We are an evolutionary condition to fear and hate so that we can improve and adapt and survive. High happiness and love have nothing to do with survival in ever-changing habitats. More intelligent members of our society will and they do manipulate people’s fears for profit and control. Judging by the legislation that WHO is pushing and the industry standards for preventive medicine which is another scam the goal of public health policy in 21 century would be to spread constant fear for the larger and larger segment of the population. This might be hard to understand logically so I will rephrase it this way.
Do you have any anxiety if you don’t have health insurance? How about something insignificant like a dental plan? Do you have a fear if you do not check yourself annually? What about breast cancer or some other cancer prevention screening? Do you think that you would feel any anxiety if the doctor does tell you that you have cancer? Do you believe that you would be able to live in constant fear of getting it if you have a genetic predisposition? Do you fear disobeying your doctor? What if you don’t vaccinate your kids? It is mandatory. You do not even have a choice.
Why do you think that industry does all the things that it does to the “alternative,” “pseudo,” and all other “names” scientists that do not follow the company line of medicine? Do you think that this is just so that you can be safe from bad doctors that will do you harm because they are all insane and snake oil salesmen? Do you know that doctors themselves fear losing their job for not following industry guidelines? Do you think “they” care about you? At the end of the day, the medicine did release us from infections with antibiotics and vaccines.
Around 100 years ago modern medicine was finally able to neutralize so-called empirical doctors or holistic or natural healers. In the 1800s society was split between two forms of medicine and there was the regulation of both forms with laws and restrictions equally. Patients had a choice of using both forms of treatment, the allopath’s, and the empirics. The balance and coexistence of both medical branches remained equal until about the turn of the century and new medical treatments emerged that were potentially very profitable.
The American Medical Association was joined and influenced by strong financial and controlling forces and transformed medicine into an industry. International banking cartels invested tremendous amounts of money into the founding of the new industry, in particular into the schools that were complacent in cooperating with them. For the money, they spent they had a request to put some of their people on a board of directors to see that their money is spent wisely. What happens was that all of the major universities received large grants from these people and also accepted one or more of these people on the board of directors. Now, these people were not there to spread science and learning in pursuit of social well-being and human happiness. They were put there as a larger scheme of plans to ensure the interest of the bankers. Almost overnight schools were literally taken over. The schools did get large amounts of money, and they did spend it on new expensive equipment and built new buildings and new laboratories, and hired more researchers and teachers. However, at the same time, they sold their interest to the growing industry called medicine dominated by newly founded pharmaceutical companies. Physicians from that time onward in history would be taught pharmaceutical drugs and allopathic forms of interventional medicine for the benefit of the private financial interest of the international banking cartel.
In the picture, you can see trustees of the General Educational Board, the first Rockefeller Foundation at a retreat in Rockland, Maine, July 1915. Besides Rockefeller, in the middle, you can also see for instance Charles W. Eliot (former president of Harvard University), Harry Pratt Judson (President of the University of Chicago), and many other “important” individuals that just by meeting in such arrangement have created something known as a conflict of interest.
Paracelsus (the name he gave himself, born as Philippus Aureolus Theophrastus Bombastus von Hohenheimborn), is sometimes called the “father” of toxicology, pharmaceutics, and modern allopathic form of medicine. Paracelsus was an alchemist, occultist, and chemist and essentially was a person who believed in poisoning people to heal diseases. Something that is in line with modern medicine. For example, today if a chemical does not have side effects, or in other words, if the chemical is not a poison, it can’t even be registered as a medicine. Only poisons that have side effects can be given with the permission of your MD, and this is exactly how the industry likes it. Holistic healing is not profitable. Paracelsus was a person that in history is considered a real father of modern type of medicine. For example, he started the treatment of venereal disease with mercury. His most quoted thesis was:
“The dose makes the poison.” (A popular short version.)
The original quote is:
“All things are poison and nothing (is) without poison; only the dose makes that a thing is no poison.”
Some reads on Paracelsus
Besides this profit-driven, self-centered interest-oriented industry, there is another part of the problems we face in medicine that is philosophical in nature. The modern way of comprehension of reality is based on a belief system that human reason is a superior force to nature. The other prevailing belief is that there is no such thing as life. Yes, you read that right. Scientific medicine does not believe that there is such thing in existence as life. Life is not life. There is no distinction between living and dead matter. Life is just more complicated than dead matter arranged in such a manner to form the most complicated and structured machine in the universe that we perceive as life. It is just the rearrangement of dead atoms. This belief system is in the essence of the theory of evolution and medicine and all of the science we have today. It is a basic principle that defines our entire civilization, not just medicinal practice.
It is hard to explain so I will use an example. We can take a human organism and separate it into working “parts.” We will get the brain, heart, lungs, and so on. All of these organs are separated and do something for the organism. At the same time, we can take the average car and separate it into working parts too. We will get a driving motor, wheels, hoods, and so on. All of the parts are separated and do something for the car as a whole. So both the car and the man have many similar attributes. They have many functional parts. They can both move, and they both need a constant supply of energy to work. When they do work they both heat up, and if they heat up too much, they need to stop and cool themselves. If they are left without energy, they both stop and eventually rust (get old) and die.
Dying is not a real medicinal term. Because life does not exist and they are both just rearranged death matter they cannot die they can just stop functioning. Because our bodies are just stupid machines like any other car, we treat diseases, in the same manner, we treat broken cars. We have intervention treatments.
This is the belief system you will get in hospitals. This is actually great if you just had an accident and they need to save your life but terrible for anything else. This philosophy has a detrimental effect.
Doctors actually do not treat diseases at all. They treat symptoms. For example, you have a cold, and your body raised the temperature to fight it. What will your MD prescribe? They will give you something to lower the temperature and release you from pain. This will just make it more difficult for your immune system to fight, but now you do not have any symptoms. So are you healthy? If you do not have symptoms, you do not have the disease. You still have the virus, but you are feeling well, so you are fine. This is how modern medicine works. You might be full of toxins have high inflammation and who knows what but until you got a real problem like cancer or heart disease, guess what? You are healthy.
Until they can detect any symptom, there is nothing they can do for you. They do not deal with promoting health and life. They are not health-practicing individuals.
Allopatric medicine deals with sickness. Allopatric medicine deals with symptoms. Who deals with real diseases? Your body does.
There are no cures. You can only help your body to heal and help it from becoming ill in the first place. The cures you get from doctors are not cures. They are treatments.
When we combine these two beliefs that there is no such thing as life and that human reason is a supreme force over nature we have something called allopathic (modern) medicine.
However, there is one curtail difference between machinery like automobiles and machinery like a human organism. The characteristic of a living organism is self-sufficiency. Living organisms, unlike machinery, can heal themselves and sustain themselves. They do not need a mechanic. If the car can self-repair and self-drive to the gasoline station, then the car would be a living creature. That is something modern allopathic medicine does not recognize. They treat every pain every symptom and every disease, but they do not treat the causes of the diseases and do not treat the whole body holistically. Medicine is segregated into specialist areas with every doctor being a specialist in his domain and looking into his own organ where every problem gets its Latin name and list of medicine to prescribe. And that is it. Students learn these “lists” like they memorize lyrics from the songs and everyone sings his own song with a different prescription. That is as far as you will go in treatment in any hospital. The entire health fantasy is just propaganda for you so that you can feel safe and continue to give a big chunk of your income to the industry. They know that you don’t care about your health as long as you are healthy and they wait for you to get some of the symptoms to feed on your anxiety. It is too late if you get the first symptoms of the disease. Remember this next sentence.
There is no magic cure. There is no cure. Your own body is the cure. If you abuse it, don’t expect purple magic pills. Only purple magic painkillers.
References:
Passages selected from a book: Pokimica, Milos. Go Vegan? Review of Science Part 2. Kindle ed., Amazon, 2018.
Related Posts
Do you have any questions about nutrition and health?
I would love to hear from you and answer them in my next post. I appreciate your input and opinion and I look forward to hearing from you soon. I also invite you to follow us on Facebook, Instagram, and Pinterest for more diet, nutrition, and health content. You can leave a comment there and connect with other health enthusiasts, share your tips and experiences, and get support and encouragement from our team and community.
I hope that this post was informative and enjoyable for you and that you are prepared to apply the insights you learned. If you found this post helpful, please share it with your friends and family who might also benefit from it. You never know who might need some guidance and support on their health journey.
– You Might Also Like –
Learn About Nutrition
Milos Pokimica is a doctor of natural medicine, clinical nutritionist, medical health and nutrition writer, and nutritional science advisor. Author of the book series Go Vegan? Review of Science, he also operates the natural health website GoVeganWay.com
Medical Disclaimer
GoVeganWay.com brings you reviews of the latest nutrition and health-related research. The information provided represents the personal opinion of the author and is not intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. The information provided is for informational purposes only and is not intended to serve as a substitute for the consultation, diagnosis, and/or medical treatment of a qualified physician or healthcare provider.NEVER DISREGARD PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL ADVICE OR DELAY SEEKING MEDICAL TREATMENT BECAUSE OF SOMETHING YOU HAVE READ ON OR ACCESSED THROUGH GoVeganWay.com
NEVER APPLY ANY LIFESTYLE CHANGES OR ANY CHANGES AT ALL AS A CONSEQUENCE OF SOMETHING YOU HAVE READ IN GoVeganWay.com BEFORE CONSULTING LICENCED MEDICAL PRACTITIONER.
In the event of a medical emergency, call a doctor or 911 immediately. GoVeganWay.com does not recommend or endorse any specific groups, organizations, tests, physicians, products, procedures, opinions, or other information that may be mentioned inside.
Editor Picks –
Milos Pokimica is a doctor of natural medicine, clinical nutritionist, medical health and nutrition writer, and nutritional science advisor. Author of the book series Go Vegan? Review of Science, he also operates the natural health website GoVeganWay.com
Latest Articles –
Plant Based News
-
How To Make This High Protein Soy Curl Shawarma
on March 11, 2024
-
Dairy Is Worse Than Coca-Cola, Says Leading Longevity Expert
on March 11, 2024
-
Vegandale Is Coming To The UK – How To Get Tickets
on March 11, 2024
-
Mediterranean Diet Vs Plant-Based: Which Is Best?
on March 10, 2024
-
The Media Issued A ‘Warning’ To Pregnant Vegans – Is There Cause For Concern?
on March 10, 2024
-
Oat Milk Vs Almond Milk: Which Is Best?
on March 9, 2024
-
University Of Cambridge Students’ Union To Serve 100% Plant-Based Food
on March 8, 2024
Top Health News — ScienceDaily
- No, an anti-racist program in schools didn’t stress out kids, study findson March 11, 2024
A new study of how high school students respond to a program designed to increase the frequency and quality of conversations about race in school finds that the anti-racist intervention did not cause stress or feelings of alienation among study participants. The finding rebuts concerns that anti-racist programs are harmful to children and teens.
- Blood-based marker developed to identify sleep deprivationon March 10, 2024
A blood test that can accurately detect when someone has not slept for 24 hours has been developed.
- COVID-19 virus can stay in the body more than a year after infectionon March 8, 2024
The COVID-19 virus can persist in the blood and tissue of patients for more than a year after the acute phase of the illness has ended, according to new research that offers potential clues to why some people develop long COVID.
- New study reveals molecular fingerprint of biological agingon March 8, 2024
Researchers have uncovered blood-based markers linked with healthy and rapid aging, allowing them to predict a person’s biological age — how fast a person’s cells and organs age regardless of their birth date.
- Research sheds light on new strategy to treat infertilityon March 8, 2024
New research describes the science behind a promising technique to treat infertility by turning a skin cell into an egg that is capable of producing viable embryos. The technique could be used by women of advanced maternal age or for those who are unable to produce viable eggs due to previous treatment for cancer or other causes. It also raises the possibility of men in same-sex relationships having children who are genetically related to both parents.
- ‘Double life’ of key immune protein reveals new strategies for treating cancer and autoimmune diseaseson March 8, 2024
Insights into the workings of an immune cell surface receptor, called PD-1, reveal how treatments that restrict its action can potentially be strengthened to improve their anticancer effect, a new study shows. The same findings also support experimental treatment strategies for autoimmune diseases, in which the immune system attacks the body, because stimulating the action of PD-1, as opposed to restricting it, can potentially block an overactive immune response.
- Mutation solves a century-old mystery in meiosison March 8, 2024
A team deciphers complicated mechanism underlying genetic diversity.
PubMed, #vegan-diet –
- Contribution of plant-based dairy and fish alternatives to iodine nutrition in the Swiss diet: a Swiss Market Surveyon March 7, 2024
CONCLUSION: Only four out of 477 plant-based alternative products are iodine fortified in the Swiss market. Thus, the risk for consumers to miss out on the ca. 25% of the RDA for iodine by consuming plant-based alternatives is high, placing them at a risk for inadequate iodine intake.
- Popular Diets and Kidney Stoneson March 7, 2024
Popular diets often influence dietary patterns, which have different implications for kidney stone risk. Despite the wide variety of popular diets, some general principles can be gleaned from investigating their potential impact on nephrolithiasis. Plant-based diets, including Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension, Mediterranean, flexitarian, and vegetarian diets, may protect against nephrolithiasis when they consist largely of unprocessed plant foods, while carbohydrate-restricted diets…
- A whole-food, plant-based randomized controlled trial in metastatic breast cancer: weight, cardiometabolic, and hormonal outcomeson March 6, 2024
CONCLUSION: WFPB dietary changes during treatment for metastatic breast cancer are well tolerated and significantly improve weight, cardiometabolic and hormonal parameters. Longer studies are warranted to assess the durability of changes. Trial registration First registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03045289) on February 7, 2017.
- Plant-Based Diets and Risk of Hip Fracture in Postmenopausal Womenon February 29, 2024
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Findings of this cohort study indicated that long-term adherence to healthful or unhealthful plant-based diets as assessed by hPDI and uPDI scores was not associated with hip fracture risk. Future research should clarify whether the associations observed with recent dietary intake are due to short-term effects of these dietary patterns, reverse causality, or both.
- Profiles of Serum Fatty Acids in Healthy Women on Different Types of Vegetarian Dietson February 24, 2024
CONCLUSION: The analysis of serum FAs and CRP levels in vegetarians and vegans suggests that factors other than diet alone influence inflammation and overall health status. Further research on long-term plant-based diet users is needed to better understand this issue, and supplementation with EPA and DHA is worth considering in vegans and vegetarians.
Random Posts –
Featured Posts –
Latest from PubMed, #plant-based diet –
- Genotype-based precision nutrition strategies for the prediction and clinical management of type 2 diabetes mellitusby Omar Ramos-Lopez on March 11, 2024
Globally, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is one of the most common metabolic disorders. T2DM physiopathology is influenced by complex interrelationships between genetic, metabolic and lifestyle factors (including diet), which differ between populations and geographic regions. In fact, excessive consumptions of high fat/high sugar foods generally increase the risk of developing T2DM, whereas habitual intakes of plant-based healthy diets usually exert a protective effect. Moreover, genomic…
- Salvia officinalis L. exerts oncostatic effects in rodent and in vitro models of breast carcinomaby Peter Kubatka on March 11, 2024
Introduction: Based on extensive data from oncology research, the use of phytochemicals or plant-based nutraceuticals is considered an innovative tool for cancer management. This research aimed to analyze the oncostatic properties of Salvia officinalis L. [Lamiaceae; Salviae officinalis herba] using animal and in vitro models of breast carcinoma (BC). Methods: The effects of dietary administered S. officinalis in two concentrations (0.1%/SAL 0.1/and 1%/SAL 1/) were assessed in both syngeneic […]
- Assessment of dietary Selenium and its role in Mercury fate in cultured fish rainbow trout with two sustainable aquafeedsby Claudia Marchán-Moreno on March 10, 2024
This study enhances the current limited understanding of the interaction between mercury (Hg) and selenium (Se) species in fish. Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), a model aquaculture fish, was exposed to Hg and Se species through controlled dietary conditions. Over a 6-month feeding trial, the impact of dietary Se on Hg bioaccumulation in fish, including flesh, brain, and liver, was tracked. Twelve dietary conditions were tested, including plant-based diets (0.25 µgSe g^(-1)) and tuna…
- Plant-based dietary patterns and risk of esophageal cancer: A prospective cohort study spanning 17 yearsby Xiaorui Zhang on March 8, 2024
CONCLUSIONS: A healthy plant-based dietary pattern was associated with a reduced risk of EC. Emphasizing the healthiness and quality of plant-based diets may be important for preventing the development of EC.
- Should we provide edible insects in children’s diets?by Tele Chepkoros Boit on March 8, 2024
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Diets low in animal-source foods or solely consisting of plant-based foods, hardly meet nutrition needs of children, exposing them to inadequate intake of essential nutrients. Thus, including edible insects in children’s diets is relevant for meeting nutritional requirements, other potential health benefits, and building more sustainable food systems. Nutrition and health research on insects is novel and still limited. This review covers recently published research between…
- Plant proteins: are they a good alternative to animal proteins in older people?by Lina Toutirais on March 8, 2024
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides the latest insight into the impact of consuming plant-based protein for older people.