The media and the world tell us that milk is essential, and that cannot be substituted. It is one of the vital food items, but let’s look at some interesting facts.

If you have one ordinary wild cow, as it is one that lives in the plains in Africa, then such a cow will produce 3 liters of milk per day. That is enough to nourish its calf, and of course, this calf is equipped to consume that milk. For it, there is no more natural food than that. The protein in milk is named Casein. It is a large globular protein not like the one found in vegetables. It needs a particular digestion mode to be absorbed correctly. He needs a particular enzyme called renin so that the body can dissolve it into amino acids. Without this enzyme renin, it cannot be utilized. It will go just past the digestive system unabsorbed as a globular protein. The body absorbs only individual amino acids after the protein is broken down in the digestive tract. The calf will produce this enzyme in adequate amounts.

When we approach the business model of today’s economics that translates into “let’s make more money”, we will select cows for milking that are genetically conditioned to produce more milk in a day. Much more milk than wild cows. So good cow will produce 20 liters of milk per day, and a very good cow will produce 40 liters of milk per day, an excellent cow will produce 80 liters. The World Champion has produced over 120 liters a day.

We have to have milk in our diet, as the story goes, because of the fact that milk is primarily rich in calcium and proteins. Then about fat and lactose and other bad things in it, the media do not speak much. They say that we enter our daily dose of calcium and protein primarily from milk. It is all about the calcium we need and proteins. So we have been taught since the day we were babies to take the necessary doses of dairy products, milk, yogurts cheese so that we can grow and they were great. However, what science tells us is that our own human milk has the lowest concentration of proteins and the lowest proportion of casein to whey from all mammals.

“Milk is for babies. When you grow up you have to drink beer”

– Arnold Schwarzenegger

Why does human milk have the lowest concentration of proteins among all mammals?

The casein from each species is uniquely suited to meet the metabolic needs of that species, which means that it will have a specific amino acid composition, and the amount of protein in milk will be adjusted to the growing needs of that organism. It’s 10g / l in human milk, and it takes 120 days for an infant to double its weight with growth, now horses have 24g / l, which is twice as big and it takes 60 days to double their weight, the cow is 33g / l It is only 47 days for them to double their weight, the dog is 71g / l only 8 days, rats 86.9 g /l and only 4.5 days and so on. If casein is what we want the best source would be to milk rats.

Now let’s think a little about this for a moment. If you are a rat, you need to grow rapidly to survive. If you are a rat, you need all that protein, and that is normal. However, why would grow up humans need all of that protein from milk? So that we can get cancer and shorten our life from excessive IGF 1 and have diabetes and heart attack from all of that saturated fat.

When there is a doubling of the weight of the calf in 47 days that is because of evolutionary reasons for survival. The calf needs to strengthen fast, and it only takes a few hours on the same day when it’s born to start walking. It has to do so because many predators are lurking around and it needs to be big and strong as soon as possible to survive. It grows rapidly because it has many natural predators, so the energy in calves goes into the development of muscles, and for the development of muscles, it has a high dose of protein in milk during growth. A human baby is working hard and takes much time to make the first step. A human baby needs constant care and is helpless and is growing so slowly in relation to the calf. What is the crucial thing for a human baby, the rapid growth of muscles? How about the brain?

When the baby is born the head still has not closed fountains, and then the brain must develop very rapidly. Even the nerve endings are not entirely formed after birth, so the brain is needed food to develop. One day a cow will not be interested in mathematics, but a human might. What kind of food is necessary for the brain to develop? These are fats. Most of your brain tissue consists of fat. There is a much higher fat ratio in human milk in relation to a protein that is perfect for brain development. The cow has a perfect relationship with the development of muscles.

Now you can understand why children who are raised on cow’s milk instead of their mother’s milk might have lower intelligence coefficients.

There are studies done on this and not just one but hundreds of them. It is a well-documented fact in medicine that children fed with any other milk than their mother’s milk have lower IQs at an average level.

Also feeding infants with cow’s milk leads to an 80% probability of getting diarrhea, and a 70% probability of an outbreak of ear infections compared to infants nourished with mother’s milk (1). Babies fed with cow’s milk during the other six months of life have a 30% increase in blood loss in internal organs and a significant loss of iron in their stool and low intakes of iron in general, linoleic acid, and vitamin E, and excessive intakes of sodium, potassium, and protein (4). Why is that?

The problem is casein. Cows have renin, but babies have very little to no of the renin, so they do not tolerate that protein. In the mother’s milk, breast milk produces the bacterium Bacillus Bifidus, which helps to dissolve casein from human milk. Cow milk in the child causes acidity, and also in adults, and irritates the intestines so that the intestines start to bleed. In addition to this, even the magazine of the scientific dairy industry will say that milk raises the level of cholesterol. Milk fat is identified as fat because it contains cholesterol and is primarily saturated.

Milk is good for rising cholesterol levels for the lack of iron that occurs due to bleeding in the digestive organs and diabetes (2).

There are well-known studies from Harvard, about ovarian cancer, I will cite the famous British Magazine Lancet (3).

Then cataracts (5), intolerance to lactose, food allergies, and toxins, and then the one thing that milk is supposed to be good for osteoporosis, dairy consumption results in the worsening of the symptoms. You can find more about the osteoprosis correlation in this article (High protein diet and metabolic acidosis).

Diabetes type 1 has long been known to correlate to milk consumption or more specifically cow’s milk and dairy. Not all milk. Today we know that even mothers who drink cow’s milk while their children breastfeed can cause the baby to have type 1 diabetes. They have discovered that if a mother drinks milk, then partially digested casein can end up in the bloodstream so that he can end up in his mother’s milk too. Our bodies cannot get rid of that globular protein in the blood, so it gets thrown out everywhere including mother’s milk.

The famous medical journal Lancet published in 1999 that new evidence favors a controversial theory that feeding cow’s milk to a baby causes later the development of diabetes type 1 in later life. Why cow milk and how can it cause diabetes? Medical practice and regular science first said that cow’s milk could not in any way be the cause of diabetes because Japanese who are like any other Asian population lactose intolerant also breastfeed babies but also develop type 1 diabetes. Not type 2, type 2 is a lifestyle disease, and type 1 is an autoimmune disease. Then they discovered that Japanese babies that do get it belonged to mothers who adopted Western eating habits, so they examined their mother’s milk, and what they found was cow’s casein. Now cow’s casein is specific to cows, but there is an amino acid sequence in one part of the casein (A1 beta-casein) that turned out to be the same as the amino acid sequence in beta cells in the pancreas. The immune system will remove this toxic A1 beta-casein. It has on the brain a form of opioid effect and which is associated with the entire spectrum of diseases and occurs due to mutation in cows. Otherwise, all other mammals that exist including people and some regular non-mutant cows that are being milked in Australia and the New Zeeland have the form of standard A2 type of beta-casein.

What happens is that you cannot digest the casein properly, because we cannot do what is natural for the caws that have adequate levels of this enzyme in their body. When the baby refuses to breastfeed, there’s no longer renin in cow milk. Because human milk has so little protein babies do not need to have all that renin. All adults have difficulty in the digestion of casein also.

If you put plant protein into your stomach, digestion will end in 4 hours; if you eat meat digestion will end in 6 hours. Put the casein in your stomach, it will swell for 12 hours!!

The Germans have a saying that cheese closes the stomach because the stomach has trouble digesting casein. What happens is that from time to time stomach will open gaps to let some of the milk protein into the intestine when the body accumulates some more of this enzyme. Then the stomach is closed again. Bodybuilders like to drink casein powder protein before bedtime because of this effect so that they have protein in the bloodstream all night long. Slow digestion is a consequence of lacking evolutionary adaptation to milk drinking. If you have a leaky gut or some intestine inflammation this protein will partially be immersed in the bloodstream. And now suddenly you have foreign proteins in your body. And what is a response from the immune system? The immune system is going to create antibodies to fight this protein. And what happens when this protein has an unwanted amino acid chain? Now you have created an antibody that attacks this amino acid chain. If this chain is the same as in your beta cells, the antibody will attack it also. It will attack your own beta cells in the pancreas, and it is an autoimmune disease. You get type 1 diabetes. Beta cells in the pancreas produce insulin.

Early exposure to cow’s milk can increase the risk of diabetes in the child by about 1.5 times (6).

Diabetes also does not occur in those rodents that are prone to diabetes, and there was no cow’s milk in the first two to three months of life, which indicates that the cow’s milk protein can activate the disease (7). This information was available for a long time, but people just did not want to believe it. In New Zealand, there was more medical controversy about this, and to this day, many farmers have moved on to their own initiative to grow cows that give A2 milk. Researchers from London and Rome announced that they were discovered by examining 47 patients with recently developing insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and found that in 51% of their immune cells they grew and multiplied when they were exposed to beta-casein protein, from cow’s milk. Only 2.7% of healthy people in the control group had immune cells that responded to cow’s milk protein. Protein is a problem. There is no animal today in the world, which naturally continues to consume milk to adulthood. Cats do drink milk when given by humans. Every veterinary association in the world if asked would say: “Do not feed your cat with milk, because it causes kidney failure.” In cats’ blood in urine and red color of urine occur after consuming more substantial amounts of milk.

And what about lactose tolerance?

Lactase is an enzyme that allows the organism to digest milk sugar, and that sugar is lactose. So now we have been looking at the protein, and now we are going to look at the sugar. Danes are only 2% lactose intolerant. Let’s explain what exactly this means. All mammals after rejection from sucking are lactase deficient. They do not have contact with the milk later in life. The reactions of any organism that does not need to use the sugar lactose in adulthood are to deactivate the enzyme lactase so that the enzyme lactase is deactivated at the level of the genes. Except for the white Europeans, which forced their bodies for thousands of years to consume it. Thus, Danes today are only 2% non-tolerant, Finland 18%, Indians 50%, Israeli Jews 58%, American black people, it is interesting 70%, Ashkenazi Jews 78%, Arabs 78%, Eskimos 80%, Taiwanese 85%, Greek Cypriots 85%, Japanese 85%, Thailand 90%, Filipinos 90%, African Negroes over 90%.  WHO has put that number up, saying that it is around 95% to 100%, for Indians 90 to 100, for Asians 90 to 95, for Mediterranean 60 to 75 and North Americans 10 to 15, and Europeans 5 to 10 percent. Only white people can tolerate lactose, the rest of the human population cannot. It is not their food. Let me show you how sugar lactose is metabolized. You have the enzyme lactase that breaks sugar lactose on dextrose and galactose. It is important for a baby, its metabolism is not so fast yet that it only gets half as glucose and the other half as galactose.

However, galactose cannot be used until it is digested in glucose.

There is an enzyme called beta-galactosidase that changes galactose in the glucose that we need. However, since no animal needs this enzyme after rejection, this enzyme is deactivated forever. Forever and ever for whites also.

Everyone, every human on the planet earth if it is grown has galactosidase deficiency. All of you who are reading this now have a deficiency of beta-galactosidase. This means that you consume sugar from milk meaning lactose, if you are white, you are from Europe, you can use it, you have lactase. Lactase metabolizers lactose and you will get glucose and besides it galactose. Glucose will be used normally. And with galactose, what are you going to do? You cannot use it so where does galactose go? What do our bodies do with galactose? Some of it gets ejected outside thru the skin. Some end up in the eyes and are stored in the cornea.

Elderly cataracts come from galactose. Adults who consume large amounts of milk, and have high lactase activity, often suffer from galactose, accumulation of galactitol in the eye lobe, and have a high likelihood of elderly cataracts (8). Not only that, it is stored in the body in other places as well.

Women are accumulating around the ovaries, and it is associated with cancer of the ovaries and infertility also. One in four couples goes to infertility treatments in European countries where there are large levels o dairy consumption. All of them are extremely well-fed. In African countries, where they do not use milk, they have no problems with infertility. It is unknown as a disease.

Here’s the famous Daniel W. Cramer Harvard Medical School study (9). Cramer saw a link between the consumption of galactose and the increased risk of ovarian cancer considering that lactose-intolerant women are likely to consume less lactose. They concluded that:

“This finding suggests that decreased lactose intake early in life may reduce ovarian cancer risk although further studies are needed to confirm this finding.”

Many studies would suggest that this sugar may affect fertility. His team compared the published data from 36 countries regarding the fertility rate, milk consumption per capita, and hypolactasia. They now published a correlation between high rates of consumption of milk and declining fertility, which begins in women who have just 20-24 years of age. This is published in the American Journal of Epidemiology. For Thai women, for example, who do not consume milk, there is no infertility at the level of statistical significance. The severity of this relationship and the decline in fertility increased with each of the following groups studied, with age increasing in each of the following groups. In Thailand for example, where 98% of adults are lactose intolerant, the average fertility among women aged 35-39 years was only 26% lower than the maximum rate for ages 25-29 years. In Australia and the UK, where lactose intolerance affects only 5% of adult people the fertility rates for 35-39 years old are full 82% below the maximum rate for 25-29 years.

What will happen when an individual that is not tolerant of lactose drinks milk? If African blacks drank milk that does not have lactase enzyme what would happen? It will cause lactose, to be broken down by bacteria in the intestines that then start to split, this increases osmotic pressure, fluid flows into the intestines, and they get diarrhea. White people do not have lactose problems, so they do not get diarrhea, but still have a massive problem with casein, galactose, and sutured fat and in recent years’ antibiotics and hormones, and other toxins and pesticides found in milk.

Many babies who drink cow’s milk will experience obstipation interventions where there is a special tool that physically removes excrement outside because of the impossibility of discharge.

They usually didn’t know what was the cause of children’s constipation that in some cases prolong to adulthood. So they prescribed the usual therapy of high fiber intake and laxative drugs. However, this study solved the mystery (10). They took 65 children with chronic constipation, and all of them were treated with laxatives. They designed the study and gave them soy milk and cow’s milk and then switch them around. The ones on soy started to drink cow’s milk, and the ones drinking cow’s milk started to drink soy. In 44 out of 65 children 68% of constipation resolved when they were on soy milk. None of the children drinking regular cow’s milk had any positive response. Some of the children have severe lesions, and anal fissures and all of that was cured when they were off the cow’s milk and then reappeared days after they were back on the cow’s milk. Changing up cow’s milk can also help to cure anal fissures in adults also. It is nothing new. Studies around the world were able to cure constipation in children to the number of about 80% just by giving up milk.  Why so 80 or 68 percent? Because giving up on milk does not mean giving up on all dairy protein. Some of the children still might consume some milk chocolate or eat ice cream or something containing powdered milk and not even be aware of it. When they design a study in 2003 that controlled for all milk protein the constipation cure rate in children was, can you guess? It was a 100 percent cure rate (11). All participants in this study experienced resolution. On another hand in lactose-intolerant babies diarrhea occurs.

After World War 2 U.S. had a big stockpile of powdered milk that they had to dispose of somehow. Instead, they decided that because there is a “protein gap” they send that powdered milk to Africa as humanitarian aid. Many already malnourished children and babies got diarrhea from it. African countries that got milk powder sent as humanitarian aid experienced an increase in mortality, especially in small children who were already at the level of severe malnutrition. They then drank milk concentrate, which in it contains lactose itself, got terrible diarrhea, and died. They were practically killed by poison, sent from the U.S. due to the degree of non-education in poor African populations who are not familiar with the problem of intolerance to dairy sugar. This topic is serious. Or how about this?

The leukemia virus is present in 60% of milk on the market.

The antibodies of leukemia virus in cattle (BLV) are present in 59% of newborn test calves. (12). Now, this is a bovine, not a human leukemia-causing virus. However, there can be a mutation that allows the virus to cross species. That is how we can get new strains of flu viruses from birds for example that we do not have an immune system defense and everyone gets scared when you say a bird flu virus. Same thing with leukemia or any other virus. Just remember HIV for instance.

Human T cell leukemia viruses can be transmitted from humans to animals and from animals to humans. This result suggests that the infection in the milk of a mother she transmits to her baby is entirely possible. And also the ability to get cattle leukemia virus to mutate from cattle to humans has been studied in many studies. Statistically, countries using dairy cow products have more leukemia. For example, Iowa (dairy state) has more rates than the national average for human leukemia (13). Pennsylvania veterinarians were able to cultivate BLV in human cells in a lab. Studies of 1980 showed an increase in human leukemia in areas with high rates of leukemia in cattle (14). Do you think this is a small problem?

About 86% of the population in the U.S. have bovine leukemia virus antibodies detected, and by 1995 they knew that this virus works on humans as well.

This study in 2003 with much better detection equipment than confirmed results from the 1980s that we are exposed to. It showed the same thing (15). And this is all caused by the original problem, and that is that the virus makes the cows produce more milk. What cows will the farmer keep, the one that produces more milk or the one that produces less? Cows infected with BLV have significantly higher production than their blood donor, who is not infected with BLV. This means that much more milk is produced with BLV than previously estimated (16). These data confirm the presence of BLV in milk and identify the potential for lactogenic (dairy) transmission of the virus (17).

The bovine leukemia virus is also correlated to other types of cancers in humans, not just leukemia. It has an especially high-risk correlation to breast cancer.

Remember these are all top scientific journals and research, not some nonsense that a local gym guru is going to debunk, and other diseases and nervous diseases are also transmitted through milk.

Several conditions such as tuberculosis, brucellosis, diphtheria, Scarlet fever, Q-fever, and gastroenteritis are transmitted through dairy products. Milk is an excellent transporter of infections because its fat content protects pathogens from gastric acid and since it has a relatively short gastric transient time.

Due to this milk property, pasteurization and sterilization are obligatory by law. However, these methods do not destroy all the toxins and all forms of pathogens in milk. Pasteurization does kill all of the bacteria but also some of the vital enzymes (catalase, peroxidase, phosphatase) and vitamins. It also extends its durability for commercial use in order to prolong the fresh appearance of the milk that was kept so that the bacteria would not develop further in it. However, when enzymes such as phosphatase are destroyed, milk loses nutritional value. Namely, phosphatases serve to break the food in our organism so that cells can assimilate mineral salts from it that are in the form of phytate. Unfortunately, the human organism does not have adequate levels of these phosphatase enzymes at all, as rats do. Lack of these enzymes will cause a lowering of the absorption of minerals that are in the form of phytates. Phytic acid acts as an anti-nutritive agent by blocking the absorption of minerals such as Fe, Zn, and Ca. A phosphatase is found only in raw milk and whole grains.

When pasteurization of milk was not carried out, it would have to be cleaned and produced under far better hygienic conditions, or its poor condition would be visible by visible clumping before reaching the customer. Pasteurization destroys the phosphatase enzyme. And this is a sure mark that the milk is pasteurized. The protein value (amino acid composition) is reduced by 17%. From the metabolic data, it is concluded that the heat is damaged by lysine and probably histidine and other amino acids and partially reduces the absorption of their nitrogen, vitamin A is destroyed, Vitamins D, E, and K are unchanged, Vitamin B complex is destroyed 38%, Vitamin C is destroyed. Concerning calcium itself, its utilization has been significantly reduced.

So what’s good in milk? What about the casein from milk (especially A1 beta-casein)? What about milk sugar (lactose)? What about milk fat? And what about calcium and other minerals and vitamins after the pasteurization? So far, we have not considered the impact of toxins, hormones, antibiotics, and other substances.

Bovine somatotropin or BGH since 1994 was used in the production of cattle meat and was obtained by reconstitution DNA technology. Recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH), or growth hormone. Monsanto is the first company to develop technology, and it advertised him as a Savior. The presence of rBGH in the cow stimulates the production of the second hormone Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1, or IGF-1. IGF-1 is the one that is directly deserving of increasing milk production. IGF-1 naturally occurs in cows and humans. IGF-1 is not destroyed during pasteurization nor when digesting. It is interesting that the same composition is for both cows and humans, and this is the only hormone known to be the same composition as two different species in nature and is therefore considered to be biologically active in humans, associated with cancer (breast, prostate, and colon), in addition to another set of disorders such as premature puberty in children. Dr. Frank M. Biro, head of the Department of Adolescent Medicine at the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Center, and his colleagues found that 15% of Latino-American girls, more than 10% of white women, and 25% of Afro-American women started puberty as early as seven years old. The research was conducted among 1,238 children aged 6 to 8 years from various cities in the United States.

Posilac is banned in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, and EU countries. A healthy cow supplemented with Posilac® produces an average of 10 more pounds of milk per day. The question is, if there is an apparent disagreement between different countries, then the picture looks like science is the problem. One country scientist finds something harmless to use, and then the same scientists from another country consider it an illegal poison. In the book Milk: The Deadly Poison, author Robert Cohen has been researching billions of dollars dairy and pharmaceutical industries were spent on influencing the FDA and Congress as well as for the impact on the scientific and medical establishment and a whole series of court processes that led to the USA against the dairy industry.

Milk today is a non-replaceable food product for a simple reason. Its rejection from human use would mean an economic problem of global proportions in a world where more than a billion people live below the poverty line. The diet itself is just as an economic and political issue as medicine and health. Chronic illnesses are the most stable source of income at the level of the military-industrial complex or in the fields of oil production. Tendencies in the food industry today are going to the highest possible volume of production in order to achieve high profits, which is economically justified. Now it goes to genetically modified crops, and in markets that are still in development, such as China, India, and countries of the third world where high-level malnutrition is present. Demand for food products and expectations that food demand will continue to grow in the near future are all we need to know when we look at the business model of food production. What can be expected is that the prices of industrial food will remain at the same level, the quality of food will decrease, and genetically modified foods will be increasingly used, both in humans and in fodder.

What is known to associate with dairy product use is chronic fatigue, headaches, hyperactivity (add, ADHD), allergy and congestion, asthma and respiratory problems, early arteriosclerosis from oxidized cholesterol and cardiac arterial disease, diabetes type 1, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, a decline of the intelligence, pimples, bedwetting, ovarian cancer, cataract, osteoporosis, and IGF 1 related diseases. In cow’s milk are bacteria, viruses, prions, antibiotics, hormones, pesticides, and other toxins and heavy metals.

Pimples from all things?

Well, acne is an epidemic in western countries. This skin disease affects around 85% of teenagers, but in more natural plan eating communities like Okinawa Islanders or Kitavan Islanders, there were no cases (18). Not a single one. In rural parts of China and India it very rare disease so it must come from the diet. Some people when migrating to western countries and starting to accept the western diet develop acne at the same level. So why is this correlated to milk?

Because of the androgenic hormones naturally present in milk and all other dairy products. These androgenic hormones are stable and cannot be fermented or destroyed by pasteurization. There are there to promote the growth of newborn calves.

Studies had proven these hormones are in dairy products, and this has a direct effect on the oil-producing glands in human skin. The problem is that if they are androgenic, they also stimulate other things as well.

How about premature puberty?

Today we have girls that will enter puberty as young as 7-year-old. These hormones also stimulate cancer growth. Especially hormone-dependent cancer like breast and prostate cancer (19). The 5alpha-P is the androgenic or sex hormone present in milk. And no there is no adding of this hormone by industry. Organic milk has it, and it is naturally present in all dairy products. For instance, back acne is 100% exclusively caused by the overconsumption of dairy products. The problem with these dairy sex hormones is that our bodies do not have a natural feedback loop. If you are a bodybuilder and decide to inject steroids, your body will detect that hormone and shut down your own production trying to keep the testosterone in a normal range. However, for 5alpha-P there is no feedback loop, our brain does not detect it and does not decrease the production of any sex hormones both testosterone or its derivate DHT and estrogen. So when you eat excessive dairy, it is like you have just injected yourself with some more DHT and estrogen. In our natural evolution, there was no need to develop receptors in our brain to tell us that we have some more cow milk sex hormones in our body. It is just one more maladaptation. Acne is a cosmetic issue, you can take the same Accutane and be done with it, but when you get breast or prostate cancer, then you can die. It all comes in a package. Excessive DHT might give us some acne and increased libido and make us bold, but excessive estrogen is a problem. The real problem of dairy consumption.

In men it will lead to infertility in a woman it would lead to breast cancer. All food of animal origin will have estrogen in it. Cows’ estrogen works as well as human estrogen. By drinking 300mg or one glass of milk a day a child will increase consumption of estradiol-17β the most potent form of all estrogens will be 10ng.

This is 4000 times as potent as environmental exposure to xenoestrogen because of xenoestrogen’s lower level of potency (20). The conclusion of this study was:

”Milk and dairy products, are responsible for 60-70% of the estrogens consumed in the western diet. Humans consume milk obtained from heifers in the latter half of pregnancy when the estrogen levels in cows are markedly elevated. The milk that we now consume may be quite unlike that consumed 100 years ago. Modern genetically-improved dairy cows, such as the Holstein, are usually fed a combination of grass and concentrates (grain/protein mixes and various by-products), allowing them to lactate during the latter half of pregnancy, even at 220 days of gestation. We hypothesize that milk is responsible, at least in part, for some male reproductive disorders.”

When cows are not pregnant the amount of estrogen in milk is around 30pg/ml. However, because of the way the business is run on the farms most of the cows are pregnant, and the levels of estradiol in the pregnant cow are hundreds of times higher. For example, from 220 to 240 days of gestation, the levels of estradiol are at the maximum at 1000pg/ml. From 30 to 1000.

Dairy is associated to lower sperm count and movement and direct testicular damage. It is as damaging to testis as cholesterol. Maybe even more. However, who cares about that?

The main marketing scam they use to sell a dairy product is that it contains a lot of calcium. Numerous factors cause osteoporosis, and lack of dietary calcium is not one of them. Not even that statement that milk is full of calcium is entirely correct. It is not what you eat. It is what you absorb. Only 25% of the calcium in cow milk is absorbable by the body after pasteurization, which is due to destroyed enzymes. Human milk, although it contains half the amount of calcium compared to cow’s milk, is a better source of calcium because of its high absorption capacity. Even certain plants like poppy seeds or sesame seeds are better sources for the same reason. This is bad news!

And the situation is the same with cheese, yogurt, or any other dairy product? What is the real distinction between milk and cheese? A culture is taken, it is added to the milk, fermentation takes place, and the whey and the substantial part are separated from it. From the solid part, cheese is made. Soft cheese and an old cheese maturing. Has it matured? Because bacteria in are allowed to develop more. When bacteria have used everything, you get matured cheese.  Bacteria could not cope with the protein, so there was a lot of casein in it, they could not burn fat, and there was a lot of fat there, sugar (lactose) was eaten, but they cannot do anything with galactose so that it contains much galactose too. So kefir, yogurt cheeses without are just the same as milk just without lactose, and can be eaten by people sensitive to lactose, but it is still full of galactose (ovarian cancer, cataract) and it is very acid forming for the body. The amount of food per mEq / 100g edible meat meal and meat products is 9.5, for milk and cheese products 1, cheese, small protein content (<15%) is 8, for cheese with high protein content (> 15%) is 23,6, vegetables -2,8, fruit and fruit juices -3, 1. What does the organism do with so much acid in the body I already explained in the previous chapter. Experiments were performed on rats that were exclusively fed by casein. The consequence was that their urine was very acidic.

Now, let’s repeat all this knowledge. We absorb only 25% of calcium from pasteurized milk and all other pasteurized milk products. It is filled with cholesterol. In experiments on rabbits, results have been obtained that the casein itself elevates the level of bad cholesterol, even without cholesterol from milk. The following results were obtained: blood cholesterol level (mg/dl), average vegetable protein 67, crude protein 101, pork protein 107, chicken protein 138, beef protein 152, protein from fish 160, protein from whole egg 176, casein from milk 203, protein from skim milk 225. Milk is the second on the list of food products that raise cholesterol. Protein raises cholesterol and 0% milk fat will not help you. It is the worst of them all actually. You will get cholesterol and especially bad cholesterol. Milk is bad for the heart and whole cardiovascular system and for the bones. When you have osteoporosis, doctors will recommend the standard therapy for calcium supplements. You will take more milk and create even more significant problems, and everything is worse and worse.

There is no correlation between milk consumption and reduced risk of osteoporosis.

Someone has been spreading lies and myths to fool and trick people (21). When we look at all the studies what we found is actually the opposite. The countries with the greatest milk consumption also have the biggest risk of osteoporosis. Not even during childhood and adolescence milk consumption have no association with bone density. It even seems that it will increase the risk later in life. These studies are so well known and so old, and everything you read here has been known by industry for decades.

Everything you believe about milk is a lie.

We are just addicted to it because of the taste and morphine effect it has. Do not give your children heroin or in other words, milk chocolate and ice cream. And yes every mammalian species excrete morphine in the milk. It has evolutionary protective effects. The newborns get addicted to opioid effects and that addiction is what pushes them to drink more of the mother’s milk and also it is what helps them sleep. If you get sleepy from drinking milk before bedtime it is because of the casomorphins.

Why is the milk so bad for the bones?

Calcium had nothing to do with this. Ok, let’s settle the “enigma” that everybody knows, but nobody is telling. There is a rare birth defect known as galactosemia. It is a genetic mutation that causes a complete lack of enzymes that are needed to detoxify the galactose. Galactose cannot be turned into glucose and used as energy. Not even bacteria can eat it. It has to be detoxified. What this birth defect of galactosemia does to kids is that it causes bone loss even as kids (22). Do you know what scientist use in studies to cause premature aging in laboratory animals? Can you guess? They use the same thing galactose. Even in small doses, galactose increases the changes that resemble natural aging. Galactose does not just cause bone loss, because it goes everywhere it causes overall inflammation and brain damage, and degeneration also.

When scientists understood that milk has a toxic effect on the body, they did one big study that followed 100,000 men and women for 20 years (23). This was a cohort study done in central Sweden. The conclusion was:

“For every glass of milk, the adjusted hazard ratio of all-cause mortality was 1.15 in women and 1.03 in men. High milk intake was associated with higher mortality in one cohort of women and in another cohort of men, and with higher fracture incidence in women.”

Milk drinking was associated with inflammation, cancer, bone loss, and heart disease.

Three glasses of milk a day was had raised the total mortality association to be unbelievable 1,93. That means that you have doubled your chances of dying if you drink three glasses of milk a day or 680 grams a day.

To conclude the more milk, the more death and bone fractures. That means that milk is a poison like any other poison. The association with mortality was a little lower for other milk products like kefir or yogurt or cheese, and that goes along with the galactose theory very well. Bacteria that ferment lactose to create yogurt or cheese can partially lower the galactose content. Not completely just partially.

You can try to drink low-fat lactose-free milk, but then you are just consuming milk protein that is bad just by itself.

Did you know that the dietary food item most associated with Parkinson’s disease is milk consumption? In all the studies ever done, the association with milk was absolute. At first, the scientist did not know what to think about it. They thought it is some neurotoxin that must be present in milk like organochlorine residues or pesticides. However, if pesticides or organochlorine residues or whatever other toxin is a cause of Parkinson’s disease, there is no logical explanation for why there is no correlation between other food items that have the same toxins and Parkinson’s. Or for example, pesticides build up in fat, but the link between skim milk and Parkinson’s is as strong as full-fat milk. And then because they were unable to explain the association they said it is reverse causation. Parkinson’s disease causes people to become depressed and depressed people drink more milk. However, then prospective cohort studies still were finding a link between milk and Parkinson excluding the reverse causation explanation (24). The linear dose-response relationship showed that PD risk increased by 17% [1.17 (1.06-1.30)] for every 200 g/day increments in milk intake and 13% for every slice of cheese.

Neurotoxins are found in all dairy products so why does cheese have a lower association? And the only thing that cheese has lower than milk is, guess what. The galactose content. There are other neurodegenerative diseases like Huntington’s disease that run in families. In Huntington, the risk is a 2-fold increase meaning the early onset is doubled by dairy consumption. In some people, genetic predisposition can be worsened by galactose, and in all people, the negative effect of galactose will increase the risk of all diseases that it has been associated with including bone loss. In people with galactosemia 20% of them develop a severe form of progressive tremor and ataxia. People with galactosemia learn not to consume the stuff, but until they learn that they have the condition they do consume it, and some of them end later end up with tremors and ataxia.

We know that galactose is a neurotoxin just like any other neurotoxin that can cause such issues as ataxia which means you cannot voluntarily move your body. So why do you give the stuff to your children?

Nobody had told you, or you do not care because milk is a good source of protein and calcium and we need it on a daily bases, or we are going to lose our bones and teeth. There is absolutely nothing good in milk. Not even calcium.

African women do not get osteoporosis on 350mg of calcium per day, and women in Europe receive osteoporosis at 1400mg per day. We will need to find another source of calcium than our milk. The source from whole plant foods. Green vegetables such as kale are as good as milk regarding calcium content.

African women who eat vegetables and legumes and do not drink milk do not have the problem of osteoporosis. There are studies tested on rats and rabbits, but the velvet monkey is considered a better model for humans. In one study these monkeys are fed a Western diet in one and the African diet in the second group while they were on the milk they lost calcium significantly.

And don’t forget infertility.

We have already said that women have reduced fertility due to galactose. What about the men? Are they immune? The study on the monkeys was carried out in the next course. They were given everything that the monkeys eat bananas and others and then added a little milk powder. The mobility of their sperm dropped. The percentage of sperm counts dropped by 2/3. While there were abnormalities in the sperm count, there were many. Different defects were obtained, and the growth and sperm of spermatozoa were changed entirely. So, fertility falls if you use milk for 2/3 plus reduced mobility plus defects.

What about lymphocytes? If you want to help with your immune system, reduce milk in the diet (especially if you have HIV and other serious diseases). Cow milk consumption can weaken the immune function in children and lead to the problem of the return of infections (25). The premature introduction of dairy products in food and the high consumption of milk in childhood can increase the risk of diabetes in teenage age in the child (26).

Why don’t we take a look at what happened to the blood vessels of those monkeys. When only a little milk was added, the first thing to go was good and the bad cholesterol ratio. In the picture, you have pictures of the main arteries. The first is crystal clear (988), which is for a monkey who ate corn and legumes. All small vessels are open. This second (920) is for the monkey who consumed milk with corn. Closed everywhere plus a plaque.

And because they have to drain so much calcium to neutralize the casein, the kidneys cannot get rid of it in time. That is why it sticks down to the blood vessels, and you get calcium deposits (picture on the left), and blood vessels become brittle and the risk of their cracking and blood spilling into the brain (stroke). It is not just milk it is milk or dairy products plus a high protein or excess protein diet that lead to calcium deposits on the blood vessels.

Dairy products can play a significant role in the development of allergies due to globular hard-to-digest protein. Then constipation, difficulty sleeping, and migraine pain (27).

One thing I found people who want to change their diet have the hardest time getting rid of is cheese and dairy. The meat they can do, but cheese is hard. People who eat a vegetarian diet for moral reasons and so on eventually don’t have real and full health benefits. They just substitute one animal protein like meat for another like eggs and dairy. Same toxins, hormones, and inflammation effects. Same IGF 1 level same everything. If you want to have health benefits, you must treat the milk and eggs the same way as you treat meat. As a survival food that is toxic to the body that we can tolerate in small amounts if we do not want to have all of the diseases of affluence. Giving up meat to eat ice cream all day long is not going to do much for your health. Except drugging your brain with casomorphins and exposing you to the risk of cancer and diabetes.

Sources:

Passages selected from a book: “Go Vegan? Review of Science: Part 2” [Milos Pokimica]

1. A longitudinal analysis of infant morbidity and the extent of breastfeeding in the United States. doi: 10.1542/peds.99.6.e5 .
2. Cow milk and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: is there a relationship? Am J Clin Nutr. 1990 Mar;51(3):489-91.
3. Galactose consumption and metabolism in relation to the risk of ovarian cancer Lancet. 1989 Jul 8;2(8654):66-71.
4. The Use of Whole Cow’s Milk in Infancy.  Journal of Pediatrics, 1992; 89 (6): 1105-1109
5. A geographic approach to senile cataracts: possible links with milk consumption, lactase activity, and galactose metabolism Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 1982: 257-64
6. Cow’s Milk Exposure and Type I Diabetes Mellitus: A critical overview of the clinical literature doi.org/10.2337/diacare.17.1.13
7. A bovine albumin peptide as a possible trigger of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus New England Journal of Medicine, 1992; 327 (5): 302-307
8. Postgraduate Medicine 1994; 95 (1): 115
9. Dairy foods and nutrients in relation to risk of ovarian cancer and major histological subtypes doi: [10.1002/ijc.27701]
10. Intolerance of cow’s milk and chronic constipation in children. N Engl J Med. 1998 Oct 15;339(16):1100-4
11. Does Milk Cause Constipation? A Crossover Dietary Trial doi.org/10.3390/nu5010253
12. Canadian J of Comparative Medicine 1979; 43 (2): 173-179
13. Epidemiologic relationships of the bovine population and human leukemia in Iowa doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112979
14. Milk of dairy cows frequently contains a leukemogenic virus [Bovine leukemia virus, lambs]. Science, 1981; 213 (4511): 1014-1016
15. Humans have antibodies reactive with Bovine leukemia virus. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2003 Dec;19(12):1105-13
16. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1989; 86 (3): 993-996
17. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 1995; 56 (4): 445-449
18. Evidence for acne-promoting effects of milk and other insulinotropic dairy products. doi: 10.1159/000325580
19. Acne, dairy, and cancer: The 5alpha-P link. Dermatoendocrinol. 2009 Jan;1(1):12-6
20. Is milk responsible for male reproductive disorders? Med Hypotheses. 2001 Oct;57(4):510-4.
21. Milk intake and risk of hip fracture in men and women: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.279.
22. Skeletal health in adult patients with classic galactosemia. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-1983-0
23. Milk intake and risk of mortality and fractures in women and men: cohort studies. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6015
24. Dairy foods intake and risk of Parkinson’s disease: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9921-4
25. Circulating immune complexes in infants fed on cow’s milk. Nature, 1978 Apr 13;272(5654):632.
26. Diet, cow’s milk protein antibodies and the risk of IDDM in Finnish children Diabetologia, 1994; 37 (4): 381-387
27. Israel Journal of Medical Sciences, 1983; 19 (9): 806-809; Pediatrics, 1989; 84 (4): 595-603

Related Posts

• 
  A1 Milk- Diabetes, autism, and heart disease
• 
  Common nutrient deficiencies on a Vegan Diet- The optimization strategies
• 
  Complete protein- IGF signaling in cancer formation
• 
  Food Industry- Hunger by design
• 
  High protein diet and metabolic acidosis
• 
  High protein diet- Health risk correlations
• 
  Lactose intolerance- 65% chance you have it
• 
  Optimal human diet- Chronic diseases, diet wars, and the vegan argument
• 
  Protein Requirements- Inconvenient truth
• 
  The Anatomy of Cancer- Health risk correlations
• 
  WHO dietary guidelines- New food pyramid and suppression of science
• 
  What Is a Processed Food? -Understanding the Basics