loader image
Learn About Nutrition
Generic filters
Filter by Categories
Air Pollution
Allopathic Medicine
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Calorie Restriction
Drinking Water
Editor Picks
Help and Support
Optimal Diet
Paleo Diet
Physical Activity
Raw food diet
Vegan Diet
Vitamin D

Pesticide exposure in American children- Real-life exposure tests

by Milos Pokimica ND

by Milos Pokimica ND

Learn About Nutrition

"Children and especially pregnant women are more vulnerable to pesticide exposure. If we test the real-world exposure levels, what would the result be?"

Most of us know we are living in a toxic and polluted environment. Most of us know that we are exposed to pollution and have an increased risk of a wide range of diseases that these toxic chemicals can cause. Chronic health effects include cancer and other tumors; brain and nervous system damage; birth defects; infertility and other reproductive problems; and damage to the liver, kidneys, lungs, and other body organs, leukemia, birth defects, stillbirth, spontaneous abortion, sterility and infertility, endocrine disruption, genotoxicity, and impaired brain development. Children and especially pregnant women are more vulnerable to pesticide exposure because the nervous systems and immune systems of the baby are still developing. Because of their higher rates of cell division and lower body weight, children’s susceptibility to pesticide exposure is higher and the dosages are much lower than dosages that adult males would be able to cope with for example. Also, babies and children have immature organs and their immune system and detoxicating enzymes do not work as well as in adults so they are particularly vulnerable to toxic contaminants. Exposure during certain early development periods can cause permanent damage. If we analyze real-world exposure in real-life scenarios what would the result be? Are we in real danger or all of the talk about the vegan diet and eating low on a food chain to avoid bioaccumulation in a food chain of all of the lipophilic POPs (persistent organic pollutants) just an overblown marketing story? What is an official recommendation and what do the FDA toxicologists say about all of this?

In this study (1) the California children were tested for exposure to multiple dietary contaminants.

Cancer safety levels were exceeded by all children (100%) for arsenic, DDE, dieldrin, and dioxins.

baby ddt vintage
Good Old Days

In past times it was rarely the situation where the entire population was poisoned, every single participant measured with no exceptions. Also, the safety non-cancer benchmark level for acrylamide was exceeded by 96 percent of preschool-age children, and also 10 percent of children were above safety levels for mercury.

Acrylamide is a substance recognized as a carcinogen by the U.S. government agencies. It is created at high temperatures in reaction with starch. So any fried and baked starch-rich food is filled with it like bread, French fries, potato chips, and cookies. What is important is the level of exposure.

When FDA toxicologists say that they believe that the average daily intake of arsenic, poses no hazard to the consumer I say that I do not believe in their honesty. The one thing we can do is to apply logic, not belief.

babies ddt nursery
Good Old Days

The study showed that the real level of arsenic exposure was more than 100 times of acceptable daily levels for adults. More than 100 times the value not more than 100% in value. I want to write this again. More than 100 times of acceptable daily levels. For children and preschoolers, it was about 300 times. Let me write this again. 300 times more. “I want to believe” too, and I like the X-Files but not in FDA lying corrupted toxicologists.

The ratios of excess exposure in this study (how many times more above safety level the exposure level is) were as follows: 2–12 for DDE, 116–297 for arsenic, 18–67 for dieldrin, 4–5 for chlordane (among children) and 202–1010 for PCDD/Fs. Yes, it is up to 1010 times the allowed values for Dioxin (PCDDs).

cancer benchmarks pesticides

Dieldrin was created as a safer alternative to DDT but was banned two years later in 1972. When we look into what food products are the most contaminated they were similar throughout all age groups.

Meat, dairy, potatoes, and cucumber are most contaminated with POPs (DDE, dieldrin, chlordane, and PCDD/Fs). Until 1988 when chlordane was banned, it was used for home termite control and citrus crops and corn.

Also, major POPs contributors were freshwater fish, poultry, mushrooms, cantaloupe, pizza (children only), and spinach (adults only).

When we look at pesticides that are in current use (endosulfan, permethrin, and chlorpyrifos), the main contributors are celery, strawberries, grapes, tomatoes, apples, peaches, pears, peppers, spinach, broccoli, lettuce, and green beans if we don’t count the levels in animal products.

For arsenic exposure, farm-raised salmon, tuna, poultry, and mushrooms were top contributors in all age groups.

For acrylamide exposure chips and all other types of fried potatoes like French fries, crackers, cereal for all age groups.

For mercury exposure, it was fish and especially tuna.

Dairy products are also the main contributor for chlorpyrifos exposure among children and lead exposure among all age groups. One of the top contributors was dairy and in some cases the main contributor of PCDD/Fs exposure, DDE, and chlordane. PCDD/Fs exposure from dairy was more pronounced in children due to lower dairy (and higher meat) consumption in adults.

For ordinary people, it might come as a surprise that milk in addition to meat was found to be a significant source of pesticides. This is a consequence of the use of chlorpyrifos on grazing fields and feeds given to cattle. This practice is forbidden in organic milk production. Milk is one of the leading sources of POPs.

Fish was a significant source of arsenic, dioxin, dieldrin, chlordane, and DDT intake.

The problem with chemicals like POPs is that they have the ability to accumulate in animal fat. So avoiding animal fat by decreasing consumption or choosing the lowest fat option of meat, dairy, and fish is one strategy to lower the exposure.

Pcp biomagnification
PCB Biomagnification

Another strategy to avoid the toxicity that will have a better result will be to consume a plant-based diet. In the case of rice, some strategies can lower the exposure, but in essence, nothing can be done because it is a plant that naturally absorbs more arsenic from the water in which it is growing. The situation is just worsened dramatically in the US because of the use of arsenic pesticides, and now the soil is polluted. On 31 December 2015, the FDA withdrew approval for the last of the arsenic-containing drugs. It should be noted that the EU has never approved drugs containing arsenic for animal consumption. So as of 2011, due to consumer pressure, the use of arsenic as feed to the chickens is banned in the US. Why has this practice lasted so long and a better question will be why have we use arsenic at all if we know the history of the substance?

Related Posts

  1. acrylamide
  2. air pollution car free zone
  3. Monkey drinking vodka
  4. Stephen Hawking
  5. Roxarsone-chicken feed
  6. arsenic-rice
  7. white powder purple background uncut
  8. green juice
  9. toxic pregnancy
  10. SBX
  11. do not eat fish sign
  12. fish farm filthy
  13. rio de janeiro dead fish
  14. mercury fish
  15. Rendering Plant
  16. baby with a gasmask vintage
  17. dirty water


Passages selected from a book: “Go Vegan? Review of Science: Part 1” [Milos Pokimica]

(1) Cancer and non-cancer health effects from food contaminant exposures for children and adults in California: a risk assessment. Environ Health. 2012 Nov 9;11:83.

 3,381 total views

You Might Also Like

  • Cancer
  • Diabetes
  • Toxicity
  • Obesity
  • Prevention
  • Inflammation
  • Optimal Diet

Arsenic exposure and meat consumption- The “Poison-Free” Poultry Act

If we analyze arsenic pollution geographically, the U.S. is the number one most polluted place in the entire world. This is because arsenic-containing pesticides have been used in the farming industry for decades. Rice is not the main exposure source in the US. In the US around three-quarters of arsenic exposure comes from animal products directly and mostly from the chicken that is considered to be a "healthier" meat source. In second place is beef, then pork, hot dogs, eggs, milk.

Obesity Risk Factors

What are the risk factors associated with obesity? Animals eat impulsively because they are conditioned to do it for survival. For all life on the planet Earth, food is not a choice. It is a daytime job of survival. The hardest thing for an animal in the wilderness is to gain weight. Hardest thing for us is to lose it.


Learn About Nutrition

Medical Disclaimer


GoVeganWay.com brings you reviews of the latest nutrition and health-related research. The information provided represents the personal opinion of the author and is not intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.  The information provided is for informational purposes only and is not intended to serve as a substitute for the consultation, diagnosis, and/or medical treatment of a qualified physician or healthcare provider.



In the event of a medical emergency, call a doctor or 911 immediately. GoVeganWay.com does not recommend or endorse any specific groups, organizations, tests, physicians, products, procedures, opinions, or other information that may be mentioned inside.

 3,382 total views

Words count 1,094

October 21, 2021


Follow US
Join our family of social followers.
11.9kTotal followers
Chat with us ( Viber or WhatsApp ) ...
Send us a message and we will be in touch with you as soon as we can ...
Customer supportVladimir ČomićViber
Customer supportVladimir ČomićWhatsApp


Floating Item
Floating Item

Editor Picks


Cosmetics toxicity exposure- Health risks assessment

Currently, there are than 84,000 ingredients used in cosmetics. More than 12,000 of them are industrial chemicals used as cosmetic ingredients. Some of them are reproductive toxins, known carcinogens, and endocrine disruptors. Cosmetic companies do not have a legal requirement to list all of the ingredients on the label. Since 1938 FDA banned 8 out of those 12000.

Vitamin D- More than just your bones

Vitamin D is not a vitamin. It is a prohormone, a steroid with a hormone-like activity that regulates about 3% of the human genome from calcium metabolism, muscular function, immune system regulation, and many functions that are essential for life.

Calorie restriction, Autophagy, Longevity, and Muscle loss

We all want to have muscle mass as much as possible and fast metabolism as much as possible so that we can eat and don’t gain weight. The question is how normal is this and what is the price of constant eating with no restriction even if we don’t gain executive weight? Evolutionary biology will again tell us what is healthy.

Pesticide exposure in American children- Real-life exposure tests

Children and especially pregnant women are vulnerable to pesticide exposure. If we analyze real-world exposure levels in real-life scenarios, what would the result be?

error: Alert: Content is protected !!
Send this to a friend
Hi, this may be interesting you: Pesticide exposure in American children- Real-life exposure tests! This is the link: https://goveganway.com/pesticide-exposure-in-american-children-real-life-exposure-tests/