Do we think coffee benefits we get when drinking it is something good for our brain or bad or neutral? What does the actual caffeine do and what are the risks?
Milos Pokimica
Written By: Milos Pokimica
Medically Reviewed by: Dr. Xiùying Wáng, M.D.
Updated May 29, 2023Do we think caffeine is something good for our brain or bad or neutral? There is much talk about coffee benefits but coffee benefits are also just one side of the coin. Coffee is also associated with some health risks that people usually just ignore. The real question is do we think that coffee benefits outweigh the associated risks?
So far research has no evidence to associate a link between coffee and an increased risk of heart disease or cancer. Some of the studies found decreased overall mortality by the same small amount, and some others found that it does the opposite. If we take an average conclusion from them, it will be approximately very small or no significant effect on longevity.
So are there any risks associated with the coffee benefits we so much desire?
Coffee seems to increase cognitive function and reduce the risk of depression. The potential coffee benefits also include protection against neurodegenerative diseases, improved asthma control, and lower risk of select gastrointestinal diseases. So did we find our amphetamine-like drug free of charge?
Coffee does have a high concentration of antioxidants providing cells protection from oxidative stress and inflammation. It is the bean after all. However, we can get other nontoxic beans to get all of the benefits that coffee bean has, and we should not confuse the coffee benefits as unique. Most antioxidant-rich foods will have the same effect.
When people talk about coffee benefits, they tell half-truths when insinuating that it is the benefit of that bean only and that we would not have similar benefits if we eat another type of bean. For example, cocoa beans have caffeine too but much more beneficial polyphenol antioxidants and much more health benefits so talking about the benefit of coffee is a little misleading.
To get to the truth, we should look into studies of pure caffeine and its effect on the body because that is the reason people drink coffee in the first place. We could get most of the coffee benefits with decaf too. It is caffeine that we need to investigate and not just use misleading science to justify our habit. It is the same story as alcohol, finding some benefits that we can also find in other food items without any unique special ability to just coffee beans so that we can justify our caffeine high.
What does the actual caffeine do?
We can take it in pills for example or in energy drinks. If we look at the chemical structure of caffeine, we will see that it is very similar to adenosine. Adenosine is a chemical in the brain that makes us sleepy. Whenever we are awake adenosine slowly accumulates in our brains. Adenosine binds to the receptors and in time slows our brain activity down. The longer we are awake, the more adenosine accumulates, and the more tired we feel. At some point, we will go to sleep. While sleeping concentration of adenosine declines and in the morning cycle begins again.
Because caffeine is similar to adenosine and acts as an adenosine receptor blocker in the brain, it will cancel natural brain chemistry making us feel more alert.
For individuals that regularly drink coffee in extensive amounts, our brains adjust by developing more adenosine receptors, so it takes more caffeine to elicit the same response. Having more adenosine receptors also means more adenosine makes its way into our brains so if we do not drink coffee, we will be more tired than in our regular normal state. In the morning, we will not be fully alert and during the day we will feel more tired if we did not drink our cup that day. It has a half-life of 6 hours meaning half of it will be gone in 6 hours so after 6 hours you will be feeling half of the effect. A couple of hours later it will be mostly gone, and we will need another cup.
Caffeine also stimulates the body to produce much more adrenaline than needed and that will end up in increased heart rate and anxiety.
Caffeine puts the body in a stressful state of fight and flight response leading to an increase in anxiety. People who are already overstressed and prone to panic attacks and other pro-anxiety conditions can have severe reactions with a tremor in their hands and cold sweats and heart palpitations from caffeine.
Caffeine also prevents dopamine from getting reabsorbed acting like cocaine in some sense leading to good feelings so by now we are in addictive behavior and have withdrawal symptoms. This dopamine effect is what makes coffee so addictive.
The reason why Coca-Cola puts caffeine in Coke is precisely because of this. Developing children’s brains is even more sensitive.
The lethal dose of caffeine is 150mg per kg of body mass. For a 70kg human, it is 14000mg caffeine. A cup of coffee on average has 150mg. This is not enough to kill but there is still one more fact that people tend to know little about. However, it is the one effect that is most important of them all. Adenosine also controls blood flow through the brain.
Caffeine produces cerebral vasoconstriction by antagonizing adenosine receptors.
Caffeine-induced cerebral vasoconstriction is well documented (Diukova et al., 2012). 250 mg of caffeine was found to be associated with significant reductions in cerebral perfusion thirty and ninety minutes later around. The value of decreased blood flow in the brain goes from 20% for one small cup of coffee to 40% for 2 or 3 cups. Chronic caffeine use results in an adaptation of the vascular adenosine receptor system presumably to compensate for the vasoconstrictive effects of caffeine. This entire adrenaline bump and stress in the form of I am suffocating and dying, help me, I am your brain without the oxygen is what actually wakes you up because you are about to die literally. That is what your alert state is. Fight or flight stress response. And that is the real job of caffeine, to be one more neurotoxic chemical for defense against pests. If you drink coffee every day, the brain adapts and tries to compensate.
Nevertheless, there is a deadline for what the brain can compensate for. The limit is around 400 mg of caffeine a day. Drinking more than that will have vasoconstrictive effects even in people who are chronic caffeine addicts. What happens is that in expectation of one more coffee cup the brain is going to raise its internal brain pressure. So when we drink coffee, the pressure will drop from vasoconstrictive effects and become normal. If you skip that cup in the morning and skip again in the afternoon the buildup of internal brain pressure is going to give you a migraine headache. That is the reason why people who are trying to quit usually suffer from headaches that can last for days before their brains start to adapt again to new normalized conditions. There is more.
Caffeine is also frequently utilized as a pre-workout supplement, but caffeine may adversely affect and limit bloodstream flow to heart muscle throughout the exercise (Namdar et al., 2009).
When we do physical exercise blood flow has to increase in order to match the increased need for oxygen and caffeine may adversely affect this mechanism too and not just the blood supply to the brain. It restricts the blood flow in the heart muscle, but interestingly enough it did not affect blood flow while the study subjects were at rest. When the subjects took caffeine tablets and exercised the blood flow was significantly lower than normal. Blood flow should increase when people exercise due to the more significant demand for energy, but caffeine blocks receptors for adenosine in the heart muscle and blocks specific receptors in the walls of blood vessels. I would not recommend that anyone take caffeine as a pre-workout supplement or for any athlete to drink caffeine before sports. In the upper mentioned study after oral administration of caffeine 200 mg bicycle exercise-induced myocardial blood flow decreased by 11% in regular individuals. In subjects who have coronary artery disease decrease was 18% and by 25% in stenotic subjects (with cholesterol deposit narrowing of coronary arteries). Caffeine is a pesticide that kills insects and other plants. Neurotoxic poison. It has the purpose of defending the coffee plant.
The coffee plant is one of the rare plants in nature that commits suicide. Unique coffee benefits, suicide. The leaves and beans that fall from the coffee tree have caffeine, and they start to poison the ground. At first, they kill everything that lives in topsoil but as time passes and more and more leaves fall, and more concentration of caffeine in soil raises more of the root system of the coffee plant itself gets affected. Investigations regarding the use of caffeine on plants demonstrated that when the concentration of caffeine gets high enough it begins to distort plant cells and if it gets even higher the result is the death of the plant.
People usually try to drink coffee when they are already stressed enough. They have a lot of work, or they need to study for the exam so that constant stressful response full of adrenalin and cortisol up and downs is going to give them adrenal fatigue and overall stressful condition. Adrenal fatigue is not a real disease just a made-up term. It is not an accepted medical diagnosis. There is a real medical condition called Addison disease which causes adrenal insufficiency. Adrenal fatigue does not cause inadequate production of one or more of these hormones as a result of an underlying disease. Adrenal fatigue is a light form of adrenal insufficiency caused by chronic stress with rapid hormonal ups and downs during the day. It is not as much the insufficiency of the adrenal glands as it is an overall fatigue state caused by constant hormonal fluctuations. Trying to take Valium to relax or because you are unable to sleep is just going to make things worse.
How many people are complaining about their stressful lives?
The valid question should be how many of them are caffeine addicts?
Keep that in mind the next time you are eyeing that 2nd (or 10th) cup of joe.
References:
- Diukova, A., Ware, J., Smith, J. E., Evans, C. J., Murphy, K., Rogers, P. J., & Wise, R. G. (2012). Separating neural and vascular effects of caffeine using simultaneous EEG-FMRI: differential effects of caffeine on cognitive and sensorimotor brain responses. NeuroImage, 62(1), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.041
- Namdar, M., Schepis, T., Koepfli, P., Gaemperli, O., Siegrist, P. T., Grathwohl, R., Valenta, I., Delaloye, R., Klainguti, M., Wyss, C. A., Lüscher, T. F., & Kaufmann, P. A. (2009). Caffeine impairs myocardial blood flow response to physical exercise in patients with coronary artery disease as well as in age-matched controls. PloS one, 4(5), e5665. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005665
- Butt, M. S., & Sultan, M. T. (2011). Coffee and its consumption: benefits and risks. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, 51(4), 363–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408390903586412
Related Posts
Do you have any questions about nutrition and health?
I would love to hear from you and answer them in my next post. I appreciate your input and opinion and I look forward to hearing from you soon. I also invite you to follow us on Facebook, Instagram, and Pinterest for more diet, nutrition, and health content. You can leave a comment there and connect with other health enthusiasts, share your tips and experiences, and get support and encouragement from our team and community.
I hope that this post was informative and enjoyable for you and that you are prepared to apply the insights you learned. If you found this post helpful, please share it with your friends and family who might also benefit from it. You never know who might need some guidance and support on their health journey.
– You Might Also Like –

Learn About Nutrition
Milos Pokimica is a doctor of natural medicine, clinical nutritionist, medical health and nutrition writer, and nutritional science advisor. Author of the book series Go Vegan? Review of Science, he also operates the natural health website GoVeganWay.com
Medical Disclaimer
GoVeganWay.com brings you reviews of the latest nutrition and health-related research. The information provided represents the personal opinion of the author and is not intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. The information provided is for informational purposes only and is not intended to serve as a substitute for the consultation, diagnosis, and/or medical treatment of a qualified physician or healthcare provider.NEVER DISREGARD PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL ADVICE OR DELAY SEEKING MEDICAL TREATMENT BECAUSE OF SOMETHING YOU HAVE READ ON OR ACCESSED THROUGH GoVeganWay.com
NEVER APPLY ANY LIFESTYLE CHANGES OR ANY CHANGES AT ALL AS A CONSEQUENCE OF SOMETHING YOU HAVE READ IN GoVeganWay.com BEFORE CONSULTING LICENCED MEDICAL PRACTITIONER.
In the event of a medical emergency, call a doctor or 911 immediately. GoVeganWay.com does not recommend or endorse any specific groups, organizations, tests, physicians, products, procedures, opinions, or other information that may be mentioned inside.
Editor Picks –
Milos Pokimica is a health and nutrition writer and nutritional science advisor. Author of the book series Go Vegan? Review of Science, he also operates the natural health website GoVeganWay.com
Latest Articles –
Top Health News — ScienceDaily
- Popular GLP-1 weight-loss drugs linked to lower risks of addiction and overdoseon June 3, 2026
A massive study of more than 600,000 U.S. veterans suggests that popular GLP-1 drugs such as semaglutide may do far more than help with diabetes and weight loss—they could also fight addiction itself. Researchers found that people taking these medications were less likely to develop substance use disorders involving alcohol, nicotine, cannabis, cocaine, opioids, and other drugs, while those already struggling with addiction experienced fewer overdoses, hospitalizations, emergency visits, and […]
- This new diabetes pill burns fat without the downsides of Ozempicon June 3, 2026
Scientists have developed an experimental diabetes and obesity pill that works in a completely different way from drugs like Ozempic. Rather than reducing hunger, it activates metabolism in skeletal muscle, helping lower blood sugar and increase fat burning while preserving muscle mass. Early clinical results suggest the treatment is safe and well tolerated.
- Scientists reverse anxiety by fixing a tiny brain circuiton June 3, 2026
A newly identified group of amygdala neurons appears to play a central role in anxiety and social behavior. Restoring normal activity in this tiny brain circuit reversed anxiety and social deficits in mice, revealing a promising new target for future treatments.
- Scientists discovered something surprising about french fries and diabeteson June 3, 2026
French fries may be the real potato problem. A large study tracking more than 205,000 people for nearly 40 years found that eating three servings of fries per week was linked to a 20% higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes, while baked, boiled, or mashed potatoes showed no significant increase in risk. The research also found that swapping potatoes for whole grains lowered diabetes risk, while replacing them with white rice had the opposite effect.
- Brain scans reveal two distinct types of autismon June 3, 2026
Scientists have uncovered evidence that autism may include at least two biologically distinct subtypes, each marked by a different pattern of brain communication. By combining brain scans from nearly 1,000 people with autism with insights from 20 genetically engineered mouse models, researchers identified a “hyperconnectivity” subtype, where brain regions communicate more than usual, and a “hypoconnectivity” subtype, where communication is reduced.
- A single protein may be holding back CAR T cancer therapyon June 2, 2026
A newly identified protein may be one of the biggest obstacles holding CAR T-cell therapy back. Researchers found that NFIL3 causes these engineered immune cells to become exhausted and lose their cancer-fighting power over time. When NFIL3 was disabled, the cells remained stronger for longer and controlled tumors more effectively in animal models.
- Scientists discover gut bacteria that may help protect against autism and ADHDon June 2, 2026
A major study suggests that some of the groundwork for brain development may be shaped before birth through a surprising partnership between a baby’s genes and gut microbes. Researchers found that epigenetic changes present at birth can influence how the gut microbiome develops during the first year of life, and certain combinations were linked to early signs of autism and ADHD by age three.
PubMed, #vegan-diet –
- Editorial: Recent insights in vegetarian nutritionon June 1, 2026
No abstract
- Pet food choices in transition: how owner demographics and diets influence pet food selection and the acceptance of alternative protein sources in pet feedingon June 1, 2026
Given the increasing interest in alternative protein sources and growing ethical awareness in nutrition, this large-scale survey (n = 8,823) investigated the feeding practices of dog and cat owners in mainly German-speaking countries. The aim was to assess preferences, feeding habits, and the acceptance of novel protein sources such as plant- and insect-based pet foods. The results showed that conventional meat-based diets remained predominant (i.e., 53.05% daily feeding of meat-based dry […]
- Environmental Footprint of a Low-Fat Vegan Diet in People With Type 1 Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trialon May 29, 2026
A 12-wk randomized clinical trial found that adults with type 1 diabetes on a low-fat, vegan diet (n = 29) showed greater improvements in insulin sensitivity compared with a portion-controlled diet (n = 29). This secondary analysis calculates the greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs) and cumulative energy demand (CED) of both diets by linking 3-d dietary records to external data sources. A repeated-measures analysis of variance was performed unadjusted and adjusted for change in energy intake. […]
- Protein intake and preservation of function in old age : Current evidence and present research gapson May 28, 2026
In the past, large observational cohort studies suggested that a higher protein intake might slow the age-associated loss of muscle mass and muscle strength. This observation led to the conclusion that a higher protein intake may contribute to a preservation of function and to the prevention of sarcopenia. Therefore, the German Nutrition Society increased their recommendation for daily protein intake in adults aged ≥ 65 years from 0.8 to 1.0 g/kg body weight (estimated value); however, […]
- Flexitarian dietary patterns and neuropsychiatric multimorbidity among the oldest-old in Chinaon May 27, 2026
CONCLUSION: In this nationally representative sample of older Chinese adults, flexitarian dietary patterns were not associated with better neuropsychiatric health and were instead linked to higher odds of depression, cognitive impairment, and their co-occurrence. These results suggest that plant-forward diets in the oldest-old should place greater emphasis on overall dietary quality and nutrient adequacy.
Random Posts –
Featured Posts –
Latest from PubMed, #plant-based diet –
- Effect of steam-pelleting or extrusion on nutrient digestibility of ground barley or faba bean in growing pigsby U S Ruiz on June 3, 2026
Plant-based feedstuffs may have limitations in nutrient digestibility and nutritional value for pigs that might be ameliorated using heat processing technologies. Thus, the main objective was to evaluate the effect of steam-pelleting or extrusion on digestibility of starch, crude protein (CP), amino acids (AA), and gross energy (GE) of the two contrasting ingredients barley and faba bean in growing pigs. Barley and faba bean ingredients were ground (2.8-mm hammer mill screen), and a portion […]
- Dose-dependent effects of dietary quercetin supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, meat composition, bone mineralization, and profitability in broilersby Md Abu Saied on June 2, 2026
Objectives: This study aimed to determine the optimal dose of quercetin (plant origin) on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, meat composition, shank mineralization, and production costs in broilers. Materials and Methods: A total of 180 day-old, mixed-sex Ross 308 chicks were randomly assigned to four dietary groups, with five replicates of nine birds per group. The corn-soy-based basal diet provided 2998 kcal metabolizable energy (ME)/kg and 22.94% crude protein (CP) in the starter…
- Quantitative comparison of food-based dietary guidelines: alignment with the Slovenian nutrition guidelines 2025 and Slovenian intakeby Samo Kreft on June 2, 2026
CONCLUSIONS: The SNG2025 are well aligned with contemporary international and national recommendations and align with widely accepted quantitative ranges for all major food groups. Differences between guidelines reflect cultural framing and quantification rather than conflicting nutritional principles. The SNG2025 demonstrate that contemporary dietary guidelines can integrate quantitative guidance, a plant-forward approach, and sustainability considerations while remaining aligned with…
- Global burden of enteric infectious diseases, diarrhoeal diseases, and corresponding aetiologies, 1990-2023: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023by GBD 2023 Diarrhoeal Disease and Enteric Infectious Diseases Collaborators on June 2, 2026
BACKGROUND: Enteric infectious diseases claim more than 1 million lives annually and are among the top ten causes of death in children younger than 5 years. Remarkable global investment has been dedicated to enteric infectious disease prevention and control; however, the shifting global health landscape is testing the continuance of progress. To evaluate the current status and guide future interventions, we present the latest epidemiological estimates of enteric infectious diseases from the…
- Plant-Based Eating: Exploring at Home vs Dining Out Behaviours Across Consumer Segmentsby Carla Riverola on June 2, 2026
A global shift toward predominantly meat-free diets is essential to achieve more sustainable food systems, yet the transition remains far from complete. This paper investigates the systemic and behavioural dynamics shaping the adoption of plant-based eating of veg*ns, meat reducers, and omnivores in different dining settings. We analyse data from 3,014 Australian participants recruited primarily through a plant-based living magazine to uncover the drivers and barriers for choosing plant-based…
- Adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet and neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysisby Yuhao Wang on June 1, 2026
Neuropsychiatric disorders (NPDs) are a leading cause of disability worldwide. The predominantly plant-based EAT-Lancet diet has been proposed to confer neuropsychiatric benefits, yet evidence remains limited. This study synthesized associations between adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet and neuropsychiatric outcomes. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global through September 4, 2025. Observational studies reporting associations between…



















