Vitamin D deficiency- The optimization strategies
With vitamin D deficiency we will suffer from a wide range of health issues even if we don’t have a directly visible bone disease.
Milos Pokimica
Written By: Milos Pokimica
Medically Reviewed by: Dr. Xiùying Wáng, M.D.
Updated June 9, 2023Vitamin D is an essential vitamin with many different functions. It is a prohormone, steroid with a hormone-like activity that regulates about 3% of the human genome (Carlberg, 2019). More than 2,000 genes overall. It is essential for different life functions, for instance, one of them is calcium development. Besides calcium metabolism, immune system regulation will be one of vitamin D’s most essential functions. Science so far doesn’t have research for every gene that vitamin D can activate but it is important to understand that without vitamin D level optimization even if we don’t have blatant vitamin D deficiency, we will suffer from a wide range of health issues even if we don’t have a directly visible bone disease. Vitamin D deficiency is a worst-case scenario.
Also, we need to understand that optimizing vitamin D levels is important for the long-term prevention of osteoporosis. Osteoporosis starts long before and lasts for a long time until the visible effects can be diagnosed. Having high bone density in younger years and preventing vitamin D deficiency throughout our entire life will have an impact on bone density in old age. Visible symptoms of vitamin D deficiency rickets that include bone deformities and bone pain, slow growth, fractures, and seizures are already the last stages of chronic deficiency disease. It cannot be cured with vitamin D supplementation and with additional calcium because the damage is already done. Prevention is the only way. The way osteoporosis can be treated is with additional medications that will promote calcium metabolism in the bones. Problem is that taking medication for osteoporosis has other side effects. Some medication like Reclast (zoledronic acid) is even taken intravenously every two years to help prevent it. Vitamin D is a vitamin and that means it is essential for life there is no way that we can avoid that simple fact even if we disregard the effects it has on bone disease. Not optimizing our vitamin D levels is the same as having any other nutrient deficiency of any other essential nutrient with one difference and that is that it takes a little longer time for its effects to be visible but at the same time once when we lose our bone density it is hard to bring it back.
There is one other difference between vitamin D and every other essential nutrient. That difference is that we create our own vitamin D if we have sun exposure so we do not need to ingest it in the food. There is some vitamin D in the foods that we eat and some food products are fortified with it but the level of fortification is not at the optimal level and vitamin D deficiency is rampant in most of the population. In the US around 40% of the population is in the severe vitamin D deficiency category and more than 85% are in the insufficient level category (Carlberg, 2019). Most likely if you do not have a severe deficiency you will still lack an adequate and optimal level of vitamin D for normal body functioning. What causes vitamin D deficiency is a modern way of life, it is a form of maladaptation to our current environment.
So the question arises, how much do we need for optimal health optimization?
In the medical field usual scientific practice is to recommend nutrition intake at the levels that are needed to prevent the disease. It is not an accepted scientific method to recommend the levels that are the most optimal and that we are adapted to in our evolution. It is only the levels that scientists believe are necessary to prevent a pure form of vitamin D deficiency.
Up until recently, the official RDA for vitamin D was considered to be 200 international units a day and that was an average intake for most people. And before that, there was an accepted belief that 100 IU of vitamin D3 is enough to prevent flagrant signs and symptoms of rickets. Because the number of 100 units was enough to prevent bone disease scientists with no real experimentation recommended 200 units just to be safe. They believed that that was more than adequate to satisfy the body’s vitamin D requirement. Then there was a line of experiments when the Institute of Medicine decided to make a recommendation on specific blood levels of vitamin D that should prevent rickets. They calculated that to get to this level most people would require about 600 IUs a day.
Today the RDA is 600 IU a day and that is an official recommendation. With this new RDA, around 40% of Americans still have vitamin D deficiency. The problem is that even these 600 IU’s are far less than what would be the most optimal level in an evolutionary sense. The level that will promote the most health and longevity effects. One way the medicine can determent the most optimal level is by testing for the hormone in the blood called PTH. Our bodies secrete PTH in situations when the body detects that we don’t have adequate levels of active vitamin D3 for bone metabolism in an effort to raise its levels. When levels in the bloodstream go below 20 nanograms/ml our body will start to produce PTH to protect our bones from softening. And this is just bones.
Vitamin D affects our entire genome and most of the organs and their functioning from the brain to muscle tissue. Measuring just its effects on calcium metabolism is still not the optimal strategy.
“Body requires 5- to 10-fold higher intakes than is currently recommended by health agencies. There is now overwhelming and compelling scientific and epidemiologic data suggesting that the human body requires a blood level of 25(OH)D above 30 ng/mL for maximum health. To increase the blood level to the minimum 30 ng/mL requires the ingestion of at least 1000 IU of vitamin D per day for adults.”
(Holick, 2010)
It is also important for immune system function and prevention of autoimmune diseases from allergies to asthma to multiple sclerosis, prevention of cancers of a different type, periodontal disease prevention, depression, obesity, diabetes type 2, and overall mortality. (Glade, 2013)
“Adequate vitamin D status seems to be protective against musculoskeletal disorders (muscle weakness, falls, fractures), infectious diseases, autoimmune diseases, cardiovascular disease, type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, several types of cancer, neurocognitive dysfunction and mental illness, and other diseases, as well as infertility and adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes. Vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency is associated with all-cause mortality.”
(Pludowski et al., 2013)
At one point in the 20th century, even wire cages were affixed to tenement buildings so that people can put babies in there so that babies could benefit from the sun.
Beyond rickets prevention, if we manage to prevent all of the diseases that are caused by vitamin D deficiency, it is still important vitamin for all-cause mortality, meaning it will promote longevity even if we don’t have any disease risk. We will live longer if we have normal and optimized levels. But what exactly are the optimal levels? One way is to measure the level of vitamin D and compare it to different rates of diseases but that does not directly mean that is the optimal level because it is just observation. Vitamin D deficiency might not be the cause. What is needed is clinical trials where you give people D supplements to prove that vitamin D is effective.
In the last 50 years, there are hundreds of clinical trials involving more than 100,000 people so we have the knowledge now. Vitamin D does help in disease prevention, it does promote longevity and it is cheap. The effects are also potent for example 13% in terms of reduction of total mortality (Chowdhury, 2014). The level of reduction that everyday exercise will cause is 11% so the effects are even more pronounced than everyday exercise. Also, the effect is cumulative. And also this is on top of all the benefits we will have on chronic diseases that can deteriorate the quality of life and are not life-threatening like allergies for example. Keep in mind that taking supplemental vitamin D is no excuse to eat one more donut. Healthy eating will have a cumulative effect on vitamin D optimization. In most studies, the levels of vitamin D are also not completely optimized so the reduction in mortality can be higher if we take an adequate level of supplementation. Also, the positive effects are only correlated with supplementation with active D3 type. It is the type derived from plants and animals and not vitamin D2, the type derived from mushrooms.
So how much? The answer is it depends. Two different individuals can get the same dose but will have different levels in the bloodstream. Then it depends on sun exposure, it depends on dietary intake. The optimal level of supplementation can be only measured with a blood test in individual cases. When scientists give recommendations they will be based on relative numbers for the percentage of the population. For example, they will say take “this” amount of it and 3 out of 5 people will have more “that” that level in the bloodstream. It is not the rule but more in line with recommendations. You will have to do a blood test if you want to know the exact level in your blood.
The problem with vitamins is that you can take too much. In the case of vitamin D and its benefits is not as dangerous vitamin as vitamin A for example. If you overdose on vitamin A you can have serious problems. For example, supplemental vitamin E promotes cancer while dietary vitamin E prevents cancer even at the optimal level. We have to analyze the optimal level and then we have to find the optimal supplementation strategy that will in our individual case put us to that optimal level.
With vitamin D it was believed to be a U shape curve. Most of the benefits in the studies will get at around 70 to 80 nmol/L (Bischoff-Ferrari, 2008). This is the optimal level in the blood. For cancer prevention, the level can be as high as 90-120 nmol/l. More than that will have no additional health benefits. Also, very high levels are correlated with a slight increase in mortality. The risk and increase are not substantial but the apparent sweet spot is around 75 or 80 nanomoles per liter [nmol/L] and more than that you will just be wasting money.
Because vitamin D is a hormone not a vitamin per se there was a debate in the scientific community about its toxic level. The good news is that in order to go to the toxic level we will have to do a serious supplemental overdosing in levels of more than 10,000 IU a day for an extended period. In real-life conditions, although it is still a U-shaped curve it is practically an L curve (Garland et al., 2014).
We can get to an optimal dose without the risk of overdosing and that is good news. We don’t have to do testing and worry about overdose as long as we don’t go above the levels of 10,000 IU a day for an extended period of time. Testing is not recommended and it is not necessary, it is expensive and not accurate. If you do testing there will be a variation in results from 2 to 5 times in different laboratories. You can get a result of 30 ng/ml or 120 ng/ml. In all practical sense, testing is useless. So how much should we take?
An intake of no less than 1000 IU of vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) per day for all adults may bring at least 50% of the population up to 75 nmol/l (30ng/ml). This means 5 out of 10 people will be at an optimal level depending on their skin color, level of sun exposure, and dietary intake and this is for a population in the US. Because essentially there is no risk of excessive intake of vitamin D the supplementation for 100 percent of the population for everyone to be in the optimal range including individuals with zero sun exposure and zero dietary intake, the dose will be 2200IU. For most of the population anywhere in the world to have a value of 80nmol/L or higher may require a daily oral intake of 2200IU.
Because the government doesn’t want people to overdose themselves even if there is no real risk the tolerable upper intake level is currently set at 2000IU/day.
Actual toxicity is not seen below serum values of 250nmol/L, a value that would be produced only at continuing oral intakes in excess of 10,000IU/day.
The margin of toxicity is extensive. So how much should you take? Because it is one of the cheapest supplements the answer is at least 2200IU a day and more if you are obese and more the older you are. If you are 70 years old you will need 3,500IU to reach the same level.
There might be some risks of toxicity if you overdose that science has not determent yet especially in you have some sort of condition. It also has the potential to lower vitamin A levels. That is the reason you don’t want to overdose. There is no need for it. But again overdosing on vitamin D is very hard to do. For example, in a situation where we are exposed to the sun, our body is able to create thousands of units of it in minutes and is able to store it as well. We cannot naturally overdose ourselves with sun exposure. It will just be stored for later use. That means our body will be able to mobilize its own reserves if our daily intake falters temporarily. It is an oil-soluble vitamin and that is the reason obese people need more, in some cases two times more of it to reach the same blood levels. It is a reason for wide confusion and public recommendations that can range from 600IU to 10,000IU.
References:
- Carlberg C. (2019). Nutrigenomics of Vitamin D. Nutrients, 11(3), 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11030676
- Parva, N. R., Tadepalli, S., Singh, P., Qian, A., Joshi, R., Kandala, H., Nookala, V. K., & Cheriyath, P. (2018). Prevalence of Vitamin D Deficiency and Associated Risk Factors in the US Population (2011-2012). Cureus, 10(6), e2741. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2741
- Holick M. F. (2010). Vitamin D: extraskeletal health. Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America, 39(2), . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2010.02.016
- Glade M. J. (2013). Vitamin D: health panacea or false prophet?. Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.), 29(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2012.05.010
- Pludowski, P., Holick, M. F., Pilz, S., Wagner, C. L., Hollis, B. W., Grant, W. B., Shoenfeld, Y., Lerchbaum, E., Llewellyn, D. J., Kienreich, K., & Soni, M. (2013). Vitamin D effects on musculoskeletal health, immunity, autoimmunity, cardiovascular disease, cancer, fertility, pregnancy, dementia and mortality-a review of recent evidence. Autoimmunity reviews, 12(10), 976–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2013.02.004
- Chowdhury, R. (2014). Vitamin D and risk of cause specific death: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort and randomised intervention studies. Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews – NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK200718/
- Bischoff-Ferrari H. A. (2008). Optimal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels for multiple health outcomes. Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 624, 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77574-6_5
- Garland, C. F., Kim, J. J., Mohr, S. B., Gorham, E. D., Grant, W. B., Giovannucci, E. L., Baggerly, L., Hofflich, H., Ramsdell, J. W., Zeng, K., & Heaney, R. P. (2014). Meta-analysis of all-cause mortality according to serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D. American journal of public health, 104(8), e43–e50. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302034
Related Posts
Do you have any questions about nutrition and health?
I would love to hear from you and answer them in my next post. I appreciate your input and opinion and I look forward to hearing from you soon. I also invite you to follow us on Facebook, Instagram, and Pinterest for more diet, nutrition, and health content. You can leave a comment there and connect with other health enthusiasts, share your tips and experiences, and get support and encouragement from our team and community.
I hope that this post was informative and enjoyable for you and that you are prepared to apply the insights you learned. If you found this post helpful, please share it with your friends and family who might also benefit from it. You never know who might need some guidance and support on their health journey.
– You Might Also Like –

Learn About Nutrition
Milos Pokimica is a doctor of natural medicine, clinical nutritionist, medical health and nutrition writer, and nutritional science advisor. Author of the book series Go Vegan? Review of Science, he also operates the natural health website GoVeganWay.com
Medical Disclaimer
GoVeganWay.com brings you reviews of the latest nutrition and health-related research. The information provided represents the personal opinion of the author and is not intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. The information provided is for informational purposes only and is not intended to serve as a substitute for the consultation, diagnosis, and/or medical treatment of a qualified physician or healthcare provider.NEVER DISREGARD PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL ADVICE OR DELAY SEEKING MEDICAL TREATMENT BECAUSE OF SOMETHING YOU HAVE READ ON OR ACCESSED THROUGH GoVeganWay.com
NEVER APPLY ANY LIFESTYLE CHANGES OR ANY CHANGES AT ALL AS A CONSEQUENCE OF SOMETHING YOU HAVE READ IN GoVeganWay.com BEFORE CONSULTING LICENCED MEDICAL PRACTITIONER.
In the event of a medical emergency, call a doctor or 911 immediately. GoVeganWay.com does not recommend or endorse any specific groups, organizations, tests, physicians, products, procedures, opinions, or other information that may be mentioned inside.
Editor Picks –
Milos Pokimica is a doctor of natural medicine, clinical nutritionist, medical health and nutrition writer, and nutritional science advisor. Author of the book series Go Vegan? Review of Science, he also operates the natural health website GoVeganWay.com
Latest Articles –
Plant Based News
-
‘Why I’m Obsessed With These Protein-Rich Vegan Buddha Bowls’
on April 23, 2025
-
THIS Launches High-Protein ‘Superfood’ Line
on April 23, 2025
-
Happiee Launches Easy-Cook Lion’s Mane Mushroom In ‘UK first’
on April 23, 2025
-
Want To Live To 100? Here’s What The Blue Zones Are Doing Right
on April 23, 2025
-
Mushroom And White Bean Soup
on April 23, 2025
-
‘I Dined At The World’s Only Michelin 3-Star Vegan Restaurant – Here’s What It Was Like’
on April 22, 2025
-
Cauliflower, Butter Bean, And Chard Dhal
on April 22, 2025
Top Health News — ScienceDaily
- Newborns living near trees tend to be healthier: New data suggests it’s not because healthier people reside near parkson April 23, 2025
The link between proximity to greenspace — including trees and parks– and healthy birth outcomes is well established. Now new data adds to our understanding of these health benefits, accounting for other factors that may influence this link, such as education, income and body mass index, but also taking the body of knowledge a step further by exploring the effect of residing near newly planted trees.
- Link between heart attack severity and circadian rhythm unveiledon April 23, 2025
The molecular mechanism behind why heart attacks can vary in severity depending on the time of day has been uncovered, potentially paving the way for innovative treatments that align with the natural circadian rhythm.
- Family dynamics shape body image differently across cultureson April 23, 2025
Body appreciation differs between Middle-Eastern and Western societies, a new international study can reveal, highlighting how cultural and family influences shape body image and eating behaviors in young women. The study surveyed over 850 women aged 18-25 in Australia and Lebanon, examining the roles that mothers and sisters play in shaping body dissatisfaction, body appreciation, and eating patterns.
- Empathy might be retained in Alzheimer’s diseaseon April 23, 2025
People with Alzheimer’s disease may retain their ability to empathize, despite declines in other social abilities, finds a new study.
- Bacteria killing material creates superbug busting painton April 23, 2025
A bacteria killing coating created by scientists has been used in trials of a new paint that can be applied to a range of surfaces to effectively kill bacteria and viruses, including difficult to kill species such as MRSA, flu and COVID-19.
- Statin use may improve survival in patients with some blood cancerson April 23, 2025
Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) who were taking cholesterol-lowering statin medications at the start of their cancer treatment had a 61% lower risk of dying from their cancer compared to similar patients who were not taking statins, according to a new study.
- Parts of our DNA may evolve much faster than previously thoughton April 23, 2025
A team of researchers has used advanced DNA sequencing to develop the most comprehensive atlas yet of genetic change through generations, laying the foundations for new insights into the roots of human disease and evolution.
PubMed, #vegan-diet –
- Living longer and lifestyle: A report on the oldest of the old in the Adventist Health Study-2on April 23, 2025
CONCLUSION: Our Adventist Health oldest of the old cohort shared many of the characteristics observed among the individuals that make up the long-living cohorts worldwide as well as younger aged Adventist participants. This observation indicates the importance of non-smoking, abstinence from alcohol consumption, daily engagement in regular physical activity, avoidance of disease in older ages, and following a plant-based diet concerning the potential for successful aging.
- Metabolomic profiling of a cholesterol lowering plant-based diet from two randomized controlled feeding trialson April 22, 2025
CONCLUSIONS: Many of these metabolites likely reflect the plant-based nature, low saturated fat content, and cholesterol-lowering effects of the diet, such as increased N2-acetylornithine, L-pipecolic acid, lenticin, and decreased C18:0 lipids and cholesteryl esters. Further research is needed to validate these metabolites as biomarkers of a plant-based dietary pattern.
- Dietary intakes and nutritional adequacy of Australians consuming plant-based diets compared to a regular meat-eating dieton April 18, 2025
CONCLUSION: PBDs, while higher in beneficial nutrients and wholefood groups than regular meat-eaters, may lead to nutritional inadequacies if not planned appropriately.
- Why is the medical profession reluctant to talk about diet change?on April 16, 2025
The intertwined crises of poor health, climate change, biodiversity loss and social injustice demand urgent action. Human activities, particularly fossil fuel use and the current food system, are key drivers of these crises. A transition to a plant-based diet, especially within healthcare systems, offers a significant opportunity to address these challenges. Diets high in animal products and ultra-processed foods are leading causes of chronic ill health and environmental degradation, while…
- Evaluation of protein intake and protein quality in New Zealand veganson April 16, 2025
Dietary protein provides indispensable amino acids (IAAs) that the body cannot synthesise. Past assessments of total protein intake from vegan populations in western, developed countries were found to be low but not necessarily below daily requirements. However, plant-sourced proteins generally have lower quantities of digestible IAAs as compared to animal-sourced proteins. Simply accounting for protein intake without considering AA profile and digestibility could overestimate protein […]
Random Posts –
Featured Posts –

Latest from PubMed, #plant-based diet –
- In vitro protein digestibility of gluten-free climate-smart cowpea-based pastaby P Pinel on April 23, 2025
Nutritional optimisation of staple food such as pasta with flours from climate-smart crops (i.e. resilient to climatic hazards and requiring minimal inputs) is in line with actual environmental and nutritional challenges. Although the quantity of protein is important, the quality through protein digestibility is essential. The aim of this work was to assess the protein digestibility of four gluten-free climate-smart pasta all based on cowpea flour with or without the addition of teff and/or…
- Optimizing the utilization of winged bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) DC.) tubers as a replacement for cassava chips in ruminant diets through pelleting: an in vitro gas technique studyby Anusorn Cherdthong on April 23, 2025
CONCLUSION: The pelletization of WBT has been found to have no adverse impact on rumen fermentation or digestibility. The WBT pellets have emerged as a notably promising alternative to cassava chips; nonetheless, the impact on TVFAs levels warrant careful consideration when utilizing them.
- Extended recommendations on the nomenclature for microbial catabolites of dietary (poly)phenols, with a focus on isomersby Claudio Curti on April 23, 2025
There is an increasing body of evidence indicating that phenolic compounds derived from microbiota-mediated breakdown of dietary (poly)phenolics in the colon are at least partially responsible for the beneficial effects of a plant-based diet. Investigating the role of these catabolites and defining their particular biological effects is challenging due to the complex microbial pathways and the diversity of structures that are produced. When reviewing the data this is further exacerbated by […]
- Evaluation of Nutri-Score and NewTools-score in a Norwegian setting using a reference standard based on nutrition experts’ ranking of foods’ healthinessby Mari Mohn Paulsen on April 23, 2025
CONCLUSIONS: Norwegian nutrition experts showed high agreement in rating the healthiness of foods representative of the Norwegian diet. While the Nutri-Score 2023-version aligned well with experts’ ratings, the NewTools-score demonstrated better agreement than Nutri-Score in this Norwegian context, despite some remaining discrepancies.
- Evaluation of black soldier fly larvae reared on different organic substrates on nutrient digestibility and palatability in catsby Hyuck Kim on April 23, 2025
This study aimed to evaluate the digestibility and palatability of cat diets by substituting poultry meals (PM) with black soldier fly larvae (BSFL) reared on different organic substrates. The experimental treatments are as follows; CON, a basal diet based on the PM; AF3, 3% PM substituted with BSFL reared on animal-based substrates; AF6, 6% PM substituted with BSFL reared on animal-based substrates; PF3, 3% PM substituted with BSFL reared on plant-based substrates; PF6, 6% PM substituted […]
- Living longer and lifestyle: A report on the oldest of the old in the Adventist Health Study-2by Hildemar Dos Santos on April 23, 2025
CONCLUSION: Our Adventist Health oldest of the old cohort shared many of the characteristics observed among the individuals that make up the long-living cohorts worldwide as well as younger aged Adventist participants. This observation indicates the importance of non-smoking, abstinence from alcohol consumption, daily engagement in regular physical activity, avoidance of disease in older ages, and following a plant-based diet concerning the potential for successful aging.